Operator Subspaces of L(H) with Induced Matrix Orderings

被引:6
作者
Ng, Chi-Keung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nankai Univ, Chern Inst Math, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
[2] Nankai Univ, LPMC, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
operator spaces; operator systems; matrix orderings; injectivity; SPACES;
D O I
10.1512/iumj.2011.60.4159
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In this paper, we study (possibly non-self-adjoint) subspaces of L(H) together with the induced partially defined involutions and the sequence {M-n(X)}(n epsilon N) of ordered normed spaces. These are called "non-self-adjoint OSs". Two particular concerns are the abstract characterization of non-self-adjoint OSs and the injectivity in the category of non-self-adjoint OSs (known as "MOS-injectivity"). In order to define MOS-injectivity, we need the notion of "unitalization" and "MOS-subspace". We show that in the case of an operator algebra A (which is a non-self-adjoint OS), its unitalization coincides with another unitalization defined in [3] if and only if a form of Stinespring dilation theorem holds for A. On the other hand, through the study of injective objects, we define "MOS-injective envelopes" and "MOS-C*-envelopes" of non-self-adjoint OSs. It is interesting to note that in the case of a unital operator space V (which is a non-self-adjoint OS), its "MOS-injective envelope" need not coincide with the ordinary injective envelope V-inj (they are the same if V is an operator system), but one can identify V-inj with the MOS-injective envelope of a unital operator system associated with V. Similarly, the "MOS-C*-envelope" of an operator algebra A need not be the same as the ordinary C*-envelope C* (A), but one can recover C* (A) as the MOS-C*-envelope of a unital operator system associated with A.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 610
页数:34
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LONDON MATH SOC MONO
[2]  
Arveson W., 1969, Acta Math, V123, P141, DOI 10.1007/BF02392388
[3]   Ordered involutive operator spaces [J].
Blecher, David P. ;
Kirkpatrick, Kay ;
Neal, Matthew ;
Werner, Wend .
POSITIVITY, 2007, 11 (03) :497-510
[4]   Dual operator systems [J].
Blecher, David P. ;
Magajna, Bojan .
BULLETIN OF THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 43 :311-320
[5]  
Effros E.G., 2000, Operator Spaces
[6]  
Hamana M., 1979, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci, V15, P773
[7]  
Huang X.J., J OPER THEO IN PRESS
[8]  
Meyer R, 2001, J OPERAT THEOR, V46, P281
[9]  
NG C. K., DUAL NONSELF A UNPUB
[10]  
Paulsen Vern, 2002, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, V78