Super-veil nerve-sparing extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on da Vinci Si robotic system

被引:5
作者
Chang, Yifan [1 ]
Xu, Weidong [2 ]
Xiao, Yutian [1 ]
Wang, Ye [1 ]
Yan, Shi [1 ]
Ren, Shancheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Urol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] Naval Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Urol, 415 Fengyang Rd, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
关键词
Extraperitoneal; Single-port; Laparoendoscopic single-site; Robotic surgery; Prostate cancer; Nerve-sparing; CLASSIFICATION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-03976-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To investigate the safety profile and short-term outcome of super-veil nerve-sparing extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (espRARP) on da Vinci Si platform. Methods From December 2018 to March 2021, 106 consecutive patients with treatment-naive prostate cancer were prospectively included. espRARP was performed on da Vinci Si surgical platform. Operative time, estimated blood loss, Clavien-Dindo complication classification, continence, potency recovery, quality-of-life scores, and postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were documented. Results Patients aged 52-79 years (mean +/- SD, 64.8 +/- 6.15 yrs), with a median PSA of 9.2 ng/ml (IQR: 6.70, 16.83) and median prostate volume of 31.9 ml (IQR: 30.01, 38.54). 95.28% (101/106) were clinically localized. All patients underwent espRARP successfully with no open conversions. Operative time was 94.2 +/- 30.26 min with an estimated blood loss of 68.5 ml (range, 50-120 ml). No Grade III complications or above were documented. Positive surgical margin was 17.9% (19/106). Median pain score at discharge was 0 (IQR: 0, 1.75) without use of opioid narcotics. Postoperative length of stay was 3 days (IQR: 1, 3), in which 28 patients were discharged within 24 h. Instant, 1-, 3-, and 6 month continence recovery was 18.9, 45.3, 79.2, 93.4, and 96.4%, respectively. Of the 43 patients who received nerve-sparing procedures, 13 (30.23%) resumed potency 6 months postoperatively. 12 month biochemical recurrence-free survival was 92.77% (77/83). Conclusions Extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is a safe and feasible technique. Combined with super-veil nerve-sparing procedures, it may provide satisfactory outcome in short-term functional recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1418
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Two Alternative Strategies [J].
Abaza, Ronney ;
Martinez, Oscar ;
Murphy, Christopher ;
Urkmez, Ahmet ;
Davis, John .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2020, 34 (12) :1230-1234
[2]   Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon [J].
Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D. ;
Miano, Roberto ;
Di Lorenzo, Nicola ;
Spera, Enrico ;
Vespasiani, Giuseppe ;
Mugnier, Camille .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (11) :4297-4304
[3]   Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? [J].
Basiri, Abbas ;
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H. ;
Tabatabaei, Shahin ;
Woo, Henry H. ;
Laguna, M. Pilar ;
Shemshaki, Hamidreza .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) :609-621
[4]   Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and "Multi-Port" Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where do we stand? [J].
Bertolo, Riccardo ;
Garisto, Juan ;
Bove, Pierluigi ;
Mottrie, Alexandre ;
Rocco, Bernardo .
UROLOGY, 2021, 155 :138-143
[5]   Initial experience on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Chang, Yi-Fan ;
Gu, Di ;
Mei, Ni ;
Xu, Wei-Dong ;
Lu, Xiao-Jun ;
Xiao, Yu-Tian ;
Xu, Chuan-Liang ;
Sun, Ying-Hao ;
Ren, Shan-Cheng .
CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (02) :231-233
[6]   Single-port transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (spRALP): Initial experience [J].
Chang, Yifan ;
Lu, Xiaojun ;
Zhu, Qingliang ;
Xu, Chuanliang ;
Sun, Yinghao ;
Ren, Shancheng .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 6 (03) :294-297
[7]   Cadaveric Analysis of Periprostatic Nerve Distribution: An Anatomical Basis for High Anterior Release During Radical Prostatectomy? [J].
Clarebrough, Emma E. ;
Challacombe, Benjamin J. ;
Briggs, Christopher ;
Namdarian, Benjamin ;
Weston, Robin ;
Murphy, Declan G. ;
Costello, Anthony J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04) :1519-1525
[8]   The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[9]   Full Neurovascular Sparing Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Our Experience with PERUSIA Technique [J].
Cochetti, Giovanni ;
Boni, Andrea ;
Barillaro, Francesco ;
Pohja, Solajd ;
Cirocchi, Roberto ;
Mearini, Ettore .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) :32-37
[10]   Applications of the da Vinci single port (SP) robotic platform in urology: a systematic literature review [J].
Covas Moschovas, Marcio ;
Bhat, Seetharam ;
Rogers, Travis ;
Thiel, David ;
Onol, Fikret ;
Roof, Shannon ;
Sighinolfi, Maria C. ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Vipul .
MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 73 (01) :6-16