Hydrological Drought Forecasting Using a Deep Transformer Model

被引:36
作者
Amanambu, Amobichukwu C. [1 ,2 ]
Mossa, Joann [1 ]
Chen, Yin-Hsuen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Geog, Spatial & Temporal Anal Rivers STAR Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Geog, Geog Artificial Intelligence GeoAI Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Old Dominion Univ, Ctr Geospatial Sci Educ & Analyt, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
关键词
hydrological drought; AI; transformers; LSTM; deep learning; forecast; APALACHICOLA RIVER; INDEX; PREDICTION; LIMITATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/w14223611
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrological drought forecasting is essential for effective water resource management planning. Innovations in computer science and artificial intelligence (AI) have been incorporated into Earth science research domains to improve predictive performance for water resource planning and disaster management. Forecasting of future hydrological drought can assist with mitigation strategies for various stakeholders. This study uses the transformer deep learning model to forecast hydrological drought, with a benchmark comparison with the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. These models were applied to the Apalachicola River, Florida, with two gauging stations located at Chattahoochee and Blountstown. Daily stage-height data from the period 1928-2022 were collected from these two stations. The two deep learning models were used to predict stage data for five different time steps: 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 days. A drought series was created from the forecasted values using a monthly fixed threshold of the 75th percentile (75Q). The transformer model outperformed the LSTM model for all of the timescales at both locations when considering the following averages: MSE = 0.11, MAE = 0.21, RSME = 0.31, and R-2 = 0.92 for the Chattahoochee station, and MSE = 0.06, MAE = 0.19, RSME = 0.23, and R-2 = 0.93 for the Blountstown station. The transformer model exhibited greater accuracy in generating the same drought series as the observed data after applying the 75Q threshold, with few exceptions. Considering the evaluation criteria, the transformer deep learning model accurately forecasts hydrological drought in the Apalachicola River, which could be helpful for drought planning and mitigation in this area of contested water resources, and likely has broad applicability elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Hydrological Drought Modeling: A Case Study of the Wadi Ouahrane Basin in Algeria [J].
Achite, Mohammed ;
Jehanzaib, Muhammad ;
Elshaboury, Nehal ;
Kim, Tae-Woong .
WATER, 2022, 14 (03)
[2]   Evaluation of artificial intelligence models for flood and drought forecasting in arid and tropical regions [J].
Adikari, Kasuni E. ;
Shrestha, Sangam ;
Ratnayake, Dhanika T. ;
Budhathoki, Aakanchya ;
Mohanasundaram, S. ;
Dailey, Matthew N. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2021, 144
[3]  
Agana NA, 2017, IEEE SOUTHEASTCON
[4]   Hydrological drought forecasting using multi-scalar streamflow drought index, stochastic models and machine learning approaches, in northern Iran [J].
Aghelpour, Pouya ;
Bahrami-Pichaghchi, Hadigheh ;
Varshavian, Vahid .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2021, 35 (08) :1615-1635
[5]  
ALLEY WM, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P1100, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1100:TPDSIL>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Hydrological Drought Forecasting Using Machine Learning-Gidra River Case Study [J].
Almikaeel, Wael ;
Cubanova, Lea ;
Soltesz, Andrej .
WATER, 2022, 14 (03)
[8]   Spatio temporal hydrological extreme forecasting framework using LSTM deep learning model [J].
Anshuka, Anshuka ;
Chandra, Rohitash ;
Buzacott, Alexander J., V ;
Sanderson, David ;
van Ogtrop, Floris F. .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2022, 36 (10) :3467-3485
[9]  
Anteneh Belayneh Anteneh Belayneh, 2013, Journal of Water and Land Development, P3
[10]   Utilization of the Bayesian Method to Improve Hydrological Drought Prediction Accuracy [J].
Bae, Deg-Hyo ;
Son, Kyung-Hwan ;
So, Jae-Min .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (11) :3527-3541