A methodology to evaluate process sustainability

被引:49
作者
Gonzalez, MA [1 ]
Smith, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS | 2003年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/ep.670220415
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Chemical and engineering research over the past several years has seen a dramatic increase in activity in the area of green chemistry. As these developments continue, it is reasonable that some of these chemistries or technologies have the potential to be implemented on the plant scale. With this in mind, a new green technology will most certainly have a potential impact on the sustainability of a process. It should also be noted that although a "green" technology may appear environmentally friendly, there currently is no all-inclusive methodology for assessing the actual sustainability of the chemical reaction or process. In order to assess a process, a set of sustainability indicators, or metrics, are required. Research within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has laid the foundation for an indicator model, GREENSCOPE (Gauging Reaction Effectiveness for the ENvironmental Sustainability of Chemistries with a multi-Objective Process Evaluator), that evaluates a particular reaction or process for sustainability in the following areas: Environment, Energy, Efficiency, and Economics. These four Es provide a quantitative definition of process sustainability, and allow for a direct comparison between two similar processes with differing reaction chemistries or process technologies. These aspects of sustainable chemical research will also be of importance as bench processes are scaled up to sustainable industrial processes.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 276
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Anastas P. T., 1998, GREEN CHEM THEORY PR
[2]   Life cycle assessment and green chemistry: the yin and yang of industrial ecology [J].
Anastas, PT ;
Lankey, RL .
GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2000, 2 (06) :289-295
[3]   Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry [J].
Anastas, PT ;
Kirchhoff, MM .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 35 (09) :686-694
[4]   Design through the 12 principles of green engineering [J].
Anastas, PT ;
Zimmerman, JB .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (05) :94A-101A
[5]   Catalysis as a foundational pillar of green chemistry [J].
Anastas, PT ;
Kirchhoff, MM ;
Williamson, TC .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2001, 221 (1-2) :3-13
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GREEN ENG
[7]  
BECKER TM, 2003, IN PRESS IND ENG CHE
[8]   Green chemical processing using CO2 [J].
Beckman, EJ .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (08) :1598-1602
[9]   Recent advances in solventless organic reactions: towards benign synthesis with remarkable versatility [J].
Cave, GWV ;
Raston, CL ;
Scott, JL .
CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2001, (21) :2159-2169
[10]   Metrics to 'green' chemistry - which are the best? [J].
Constable, DJC ;
Curzons, AD ;
Cunningham, VL .
GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2002, 4 (06) :521-527