Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia: The Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Labor Outcome. A Randomized Double-Blind Study in Nulliparous Women

被引:134
作者
Capogna, Giorgio [1 ]
Camorcia, Michela [1 ]
Stirparo, Silvia [1 ]
Farcomeni, Alessio [1 ]
机构
[1] Citta Roma Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, I-00151 Rome, Italy
关键词
ROPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; MODEL;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Programmed intermittent epidural anesthetic bolus (PIEB) technique may result in reduced total local anesthetic consumption, fewer manual boluses, and greater patient satisfaction compared with continuous epidural infusion (CEI). In this randomized, double-blind study, we compared the incidence of motor block and labor outcome in women who received PIEB or CEI for maintenance of labor analgesia. The primary outcome variable was maternal motor function and the secondary outcome was mode of delivery. METHODS: Nulliparous, term women with spontaneous labor and cervical dilation <4 cm were eligible to participate in the study. Epidural analgesia was initiated and maintained with a solution of levobupivacaine 0.0625% with sufentanil 0.5 mu g/mL. After an initial epidural loading dose of 20 mL, patients were randomly assigned to receive PIEB (10 mL every hour beginning 60 minutes after the initial dose) or CEI (10 mL/h, beginning immediately after the initial dose) for the maintenance of analgesia. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using a second infusion pump with levobupivacaine 0.125% was used to treat breakthrough pain. The degree of motor block was assessed in both lower extremities using the modified Bromage score at regular intervals throughout labor; the end point was any motor block in either limb. We also evaluated PCEA bolus doses and total analgesic solution consumption. RESULTS: We studied 145 subjects (PIEB = 75; CEI = 70). Motor block was reported in 37% in the CEI group and in 2.7% in the PIEB group (P < 0.001; odds ratio = 21.2; 95% CI: 4.9-129.3); it occurred earlier (P = 0.008) (hazard ratio = 7.8; 95% CI: 1.9-30.8; P = 0.003) and was more frequent at full cervical dilation in the CEI group (P < 0.001). The incidence of instrumental delivery was 20% for the CEI group and 7% for the PIEB group (P = 0.03). Total levobupivacaine consumption, number of patients requiring additional PCEA boluses, and mean number of PCEA boluses per patient were lower in the PIEB group (P < 0.001). No differences in pain scores and duration of labor analgesia were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance of epidural analgesia with PIEB compared with CEI resulted in a lower incidence of maternal motor block and instrumental vaginal delivery. (Anesth Analg 2011;113:826-31)
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 831
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LOCAL ANESTHETICS
[2]   Local anesthetics and mode of delivery: Bupivacaine versus ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine [J].
Beilin, Yaakov ;
Guinn, Nicole R. ;
Bernstein, Howard H. ;
Zahn, Jeff ;
Hossain, Sabera ;
Bodian, Carol A. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (03) :756-763
[3]   Comparison of intermittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labor [J].
Boutros, A ;
Blary, S ;
Bronchard, R ;
Bonnet, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1999, 8 (04) :236-241
[4]  
BREEN TW, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P919
[5]  
Chua SMH, 2004, CAN J ANAESTH, V51, P581, DOI 10.1007/BF03018402
[6]   Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour [J].
Fettes, P. D. W. ;
Moore, C. S. ;
Whiteside, J. B. ;
Mcleod, G. A. ;
Wildsmith, J. A. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 97 (03) :359-364
[7]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[8]   A CLASS OF K-SAMPLE TESTS FOR COMPARING THE CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE OF A COMPETING RISK [J].
GRAY, RJ .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1988, 16 (03) :1141-1154
[9]  
Henderson R, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P465, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.4.465
[10]   Distribution of solution in the epidural space: Examination by cryomicrotome section [J].
Hogan, Q .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (02) :150-156