Mindful in a random forest: Assessing the validity of mindfulness items using random forests methods

被引:26
作者
Sauer, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Lemke, Jana [2 ,3 ]
Zinn, Winfried [4 ,5 ]
Buettner, Ricardo [1 ]
Kohls, Niko [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] FOM Univ Appl Sci, D-45141 Essen, Germany
[2] Samueli Inst, Alexandria, VA USA
[3] Europa Univ Viadrina Frankfurt Oder, D-15230 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Forsch Grp Metr, Bermuthshain, Germany
[5] Appl Univ Hlth & Sports, Berlin, Germany
[6] Coburg Univ Appl Sci, Coburg, Germany
关键词
Mindfulness; Assessment; Measurement; Psychometrics; Random forests; RASCH ANALYSIS; FREIBURG; ATTENTION; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whereas the number of studies supporting the efficacy of mindfulness as a health intervention is increasing, the measurement of mindfulness remains a subject of debate. Given the importance of measurement in this field, this paper aims to further our understanding of the assessment of mindfulness by employing an approach referred to as "random forests" (RF). RF is an ensemble learning method that is based on decision trees. RF is well known in biological research, for example, but is practically unknown in psychometrics. In this study, RF was used to gauge the predictive validity of the items from two mindfulness instruments concerning their ability to estimate group allocation (i.e., mindfulness practitioners vs. nonpractitioners). To allow for a better generalization of the results, we examined the research questions in two samples (N = 76 and N = 202) of different quality. We investigated two instruments: the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) and the Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale. Although results indicated that both instruments were capable of distinguishing practitioners from nonpractitioners, the predictive quality of most items on both scales was determined to be insufficient. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 123
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abu-Nimeh S., 2007, COMP MACHINE LEARNIN
[2]   The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy on mental health of adults with a chronic medical disease: A meta-analysis [J].
Bohlmeijer, Ernst ;
Prenger, Rilana ;
Taal, Erik ;
Cuijpers, Pim .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 (06) :539-544
[3]  
Bosch A., 2007, COMPUTER VISION
[4]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[5]   Mindfulness Groups for Distressing Voices and Paranoia: A Replication and Randomized Feasibility Trial [J].
Chadwick, Paul ;
Hughes, Stephanie ;
Russell, Daphne ;
Russell, Ian ;
Dagnan, Dave .
BEHAVIOURAL AND COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2009, 37 (04) :403-412
[6]   Mindfulness Training Reduces the Severity of Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Women: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Gaylord, Susan A. ;
Palsson, Olafur S. ;
Garland, Eric L. ;
Faurot, Keturah R. ;
Coble, Rebecca S. ;
Mann, J. Douglas ;
Frey, William ;
Leniek, Karyn ;
Whitehead, William E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (09) :1678-1688
[7]   Defining Mindfulness by How Poorly I Think I Pay Attention During Everyday Awareness and Other Intractable Problems for Psychology's (Re) Invention of Mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011) [J].
Grossman, Paul .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 23 (04) :1034-1040
[8]   Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework [J].
Hothorn, Torsten ;
Hornik, Kurt ;
Zeileis, Achim .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2006, 15 (03) :651-674
[9]   Facets of mindfulness - Results of an online study investigating the Freiburg mindfulness inventory [J].
Kohls, Niko ;
Sauer, Sebastian ;
Walach, Harald .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 46 (02) :224-230
[10]   Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse [J].
Leigh, J ;
Bowen, S ;
Marlatt, GA .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2005, 30 (07) :1335-1341