Purposeful Stakeholder Engagement for Improved Environmental Flow Outcomes

被引:18
作者
Mussehl, Meghan L. [1 ]
Horne, Avril C. [1 ]
Webb, J. Angus [1 ]
Poff, N. LeRoy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Environm Hydrol & Water Resources Grp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
adaptive management; rivers; participatory methods; stakeholder engagement; social-ecological system (SES); environmental water; environmental flows (e-flows); STRUCTURED DECISION-MAKING; WATER MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER-BASIN; KNOWLEDGE COPRODUCTION; TURBULENT BOUNDARY; ECOLOGICAL LIMITS; ALTERATION ELOHA; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2021.749864
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rivers are dynamic social-ecological systems that support societies and ecosystems in a multitude of ways, giving rise to a variety of user groups and competing interests. Environmental flows (e-flows) programs developed to protect riverine environments are often conceived by water managers and researchers. This is despite continued calls for increased public participation to include local communities and Indigenous peoples in the development process. Failure to do so undermines social legitimacy and program effectiveness. In this paper, we describe how adaptive management of e-flows allows an opportunity to incorporate a diversity of stakeholder views through an iterative process. However, to achieve this, stakeholder engagement must be intentionally integrated into the adaptive management cycle. Stakeholder engagement in e-flows allows for the creation of a shared understanding of a river and opens collaborative and innovative management strategies that address multiple axes of uncertainty. Here, we describe a holistic framework that unifies current participatory engagement attempts and existing technical methods into a complete strategy. The framework identifies the primary steps in an e-flows adaptive management cycle, describes potential roles of various stakeholders, and proposes potential engagement tools. Restructuring e-flows methods to adequately include stakeholders requires a shift from being driven by deliverables, such as reports and flow recommendations, to focusing on people-oriented outcomes, such as continuous learning and fostering relationships. While our work has been placed in the context of e-flows, the intentional integration of stakeholder engagement in adaptive management is pertinent to natural resources management generally.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 156 条
[21]  
Connor J., 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 world water and environmental resources congress, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1061/40737(2004)323, 10.1061/40737(2004)323]
[22]   The persistence of 'normal' catchment management despite the participatory turn: Exploring the power effects of competing frames of reference [J].
Cook, Brian R. ;
Kesby, Mike ;
Fazey, Ioan ;
Spray, Chris .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2013, 43 (05) :754-779
[23]   Public engagement with climate change: the role of human values [J].
Corner, Adam ;
Markowitz, Ezra ;
Pidgeon, Nick .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (03) :411-422
[24]   Relationships between Maori values and streamflow: tools for incorporating cultural values into freshwater management decisions [J].
Crow, Shannan K. ;
Tipa, Gail T. ;
Booker, Doug J. ;
Nelson, Kyle D. .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 2018, 52 (04) :626-642
[25]   THE TURBULENT BOUNDARY BETWEEN WATER SCIENCE AND WATER MANAGEMENT [J].
CULLEN, P .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1990, 24 (01) :201-209
[26]   Minimising biases in expert elicitations to inform environmental management: Case studies from environmental flows in Australia [J].
de Little, Siobhan C. ;
Casas-Mulet, Roser ;
Patulny, Lisa ;
Wand, Joanna ;
Miller, Kimberly A. ;
Fidler, Fiona ;
Stewardson, Michael J. ;
Webb, J. Angus .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 100 :146-158
[27]  
de Matos CG, 2015, ERDE, V146, P175
[28]   Comparing Environmental Flow Implementation Options with Structured Decision Making: Case Study from the Willamette River, Oregon [J].
DeWeber, J. Tyrell ;
Peterson, James T. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2020, 56 (04) :599-614
[29]   The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: lessons from international practice [J].
Djenontin, Ida Nadia S. ;
Meadow, Alison M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 61 (06) :885-903
[30]   Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects [J].
Edelenbos, Jurian ;
van Buuren, Arwin ;
van Schie, Nienke .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2011, 14 (06) :675-684