Purposeful Stakeholder Engagement for Improved Environmental Flow Outcomes

被引:18
作者
Mussehl, Meghan L. [1 ]
Horne, Avril C. [1 ]
Webb, J. Angus [1 ]
Poff, N. LeRoy [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Infrastruct Engn, Environm Hydrol & Water Resources Grp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Univ Canberra, Inst Appl Ecol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
adaptive management; rivers; participatory methods; stakeholder engagement; social-ecological system (SES); environmental water; environmental flows (e-flows); STRUCTURED DECISION-MAKING; WATER MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER-BASIN; KNOWLEDGE COPRODUCTION; TURBULENT BOUNDARY; ECOLOGICAL LIMITS; ALTERATION ELOHA; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2021.749864
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rivers are dynamic social-ecological systems that support societies and ecosystems in a multitude of ways, giving rise to a variety of user groups and competing interests. Environmental flows (e-flows) programs developed to protect riverine environments are often conceived by water managers and researchers. This is despite continued calls for increased public participation to include local communities and Indigenous peoples in the development process. Failure to do so undermines social legitimacy and program effectiveness. In this paper, we describe how adaptive management of e-flows allows an opportunity to incorporate a diversity of stakeholder views through an iterative process. However, to achieve this, stakeholder engagement must be intentionally integrated into the adaptive management cycle. Stakeholder engagement in e-flows allows for the creation of a shared understanding of a river and opens collaborative and innovative management strategies that address multiple axes of uncertainty. Here, we describe a holistic framework that unifies current participatory engagement attempts and existing technical methods into a complete strategy. The framework identifies the primary steps in an e-flows adaptive management cycle, describes potential roles of various stakeholders, and proposes potential engagement tools. Restructuring e-flows methods to adequately include stakeholders requires a shift from being driven by deliverables, such as reports and flow recommendations, to focusing on people-oriented outcomes, such as continuous learning and fostering relationships. While our work has been placed in the context of e-flows, the intentional integration of stakeholder engagement in adaptive management is pertinent to natural resources management generally.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 156 条
[1]   Citizen Science as an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence [J].
Aceves-Bueno, Erendira ;
Adeleye, Adeyemi S. ;
Bradley, Darcy ;
Brandt, W. Tyler ;
Callery, Patrick ;
Feraud, Marina ;
Garner, Kendra L. ;
Gentry, Rebecca ;
Huang, Yuxiong ;
McCullough, Ian ;
Pearlman, Isaac ;
Sutherland, Sara A. ;
Wilkinson, Whitney ;
Yang, Yi ;
Zink, Trevor ;
Anderson, Sarah E. ;
Tague, Christina .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, 18 (03) :493-506
[2]   The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows [J].
Acreman, M. C. ;
Overton, I. C. ;
King, J. ;
Wood, P. J. ;
Cowx, I. G. ;
Dunbar, M. J. ;
Kendy, E. ;
Young, W. J. .
HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2014, 59 (3-4) :433-450
[3]  
Allan C, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P520, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0931-3
[4]   Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management [J].
Anderson, Elizabeth P. ;
Jackson, Sue ;
Tharme, Rebecca E. ;
Douglas, Michael ;
Flotemersch, Joseph E. ;
Zwarteveen, Margreet ;
Lokgariwar, Chicu ;
Montoya, Mariana ;
Wali, Alaka ;
Tipa, Gail T. ;
Jardine, Timothy D. ;
Olden, Julian D. ;
Cheng, Lin ;
Conallin, John ;
Cosens, Barbara ;
Dickens, Chris ;
Garrick, Dustin ;
Groenfeldt, David ;
Kabogo, Jane ;
Roux, Dirk J. ;
Ruhi, Albert ;
Arthington, Angela H. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2019, 6 (06)
[5]  
[Anonymous], Judicial Guide to the Structured Decision Making Model in Juvenile Justice
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1978, Adaptive environmental assessment and management
[7]   Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic [J].
Armitage, Derek ;
Berkes, Fikret ;
Dale, Aaron ;
Kocho-Schellenberg, Erik ;
Patton, Eva .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (03) :995-1004
[8]   The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018) [J].
Arthington, Angela H. ;
Bhaduri, Anik ;
Bunn, Stuart E. ;
Jackson, Sue E. ;
Tharme, Rebecca E. ;
Tickner, Dave ;
Young, Bill ;
Acreman, Mike ;
Baker, Natalie ;
Capon, Samantha ;
Horne, Avril C. ;
Kendy, Eloise ;
McClain, Michael E. ;
Poff, N. Leroy ;
Richter, Brian D. ;
Ward, Selina .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6
[9]   Water: Political, biopolitical, material [J].
Bakker, Karen .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2012, 42 (04) :616-623
[10]   Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management [J].
Basco-Carrera, Laura ;
Warren, Andrew ;
van Beek, Eelco ;
Jonoski, Andreja ;
Giardino, Alessio .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 91 :95-110