The prognostic value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography metabolic tumor volume in solitary colorectal liver metastasis

被引:8
作者
Huang, Yi-Tung T. [1 ,4 ]
Park, Joomann [4 ]
Chong, Shanley [4 ,7 ]
Hugh, Thomas J. [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Ng, Weng Leong [2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
Lin, Michael [1 ,4 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Nucl Med & PET, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[2] Liverpool Hosp, Med Oncol, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
[5] Royal North Shore Hosp, Upper GI Surg Unit, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[6] North Shore Private Hosp, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[7] Southwestern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Epidemiol Hlth People & Places Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Univ Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
colorectal cancer; liver metastasis; PET; CT; prognosis; surgery; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; HEPATIC RESECTION; F-18-FDG PET; LUNG-CANCER; CT;
D O I
10.1111/ajco.12568
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundManagement of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is evolving but surgery remains the most effective treatment in improving survival. Optimal preoperative patient selection is important and semiquantitative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) parameters may provide valuable prognostic information. MethodsSixty-one patients with solitary CRLM as first site of distant dissemination and preoperatively staged with PET were retrospectively studied. Various semiquantitative PET parameters, pathological size of the hepatic lesion and clinical variables were correlated with survival outcome. The data were analyzed with nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and univariate Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were log-rank tested. ResultsMean follow-up for the 61 subjects was 48 months. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 98.7% and 72.2%. The median DFS was 16 months with recurrence in 10 (16.4%) patients following surgery. Univariate analysis found a statistically significant increased risk of death for higher mean PET tumor diameter (hazard ratio [HR] 2.95, P = 0.014), mean metabolic tumor volume (HR 3.0, P = 0.009) and median pathological size of hepatic lesion (HR 2.97, P = 0.022). Maximum standardized uptake value of the liver metastasis and calculated standardized uptake value ratio between tumor and normal liver parenchyma (tumor background ratio) were not predictive of overall survival. None of the PET parameters or clincopathological variables statistically correlated with DFS. ConclusionSemiquantitative PET variables are potentially valuable prognostic biomarkers in CRLM. Volumetric data like metabolic tumor volume enable better estimation of tumor burden and its utility may improve preoperative risk stratification and optimize outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:E262 / E270
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Improved Long-Term Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Staging With FDG Positron Emission Tomography
    Abbadi, Reyad A.
    Sadat, Umar
    Jah, Asif
    Praseedom, Raaj K.
    Jamieson, Neville V.
    Cheow, Heok K.
    Whitley, Siobhan
    Ford, Hugo E.
    Wilson, Charles B.
    Harper, Simon J. F.
    Huguet, Emmanuel L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (03) : 313 - 319
  • [2] Clinical implication and prognostic significance of standardised uptake value of primary non-small cell lung cancer on positron emission tomography: analysis of 176 cases
    Al-Sarraf, Nael
    Gately, Kathy
    Lucey, Julie
    Aziz, Rashid
    Doddakula, Kishore
    Wilson, Lorraine
    McGovern, Eillish
    Young, Vincent
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 34 (04) : 892 - 897
  • [3] FDG-PET for the pre-operative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases
    Arulampalam, THA
    Francis, DL
    Visvikis, D
    Taylor, I
    Ell, PJ
    [J]. EJSO, 2004, 30 (03): : 286 - 291
  • [4] Tumor Quantification in Clinical Positron Emission Tomography
    Bai, Bing
    Bading, James
    Conti, Peter S.
    [J]. THERANOSTICS, 2013, 3 (10): : 787 - 801
  • [5] Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis - Meta-analysis
    Bipat, S
    van Leeuwen, MS
    Comans, EFI
    Pijl, MEJ
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Zwinderman, AH
    Stoker, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) : 123 - 131
  • [6] Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma
    Buetof, Rebecca
    Hofheinz, Frank
    Zoephel, Klaus
    Stadelmann, Tobias
    Schmollack, Julia
    Jentsch, Christina
    Loeck, Steffen
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    Baumann, Michael
    van den Hoff, Joerg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (08) : 1150 - 1156
  • [7] FDG-PET for prediction of survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma
    de Geus-Oei, L. F.
    Wiering, B.
    Krabbe, P. F. M.
    Ruers, T. J. M.
    Punt, C. J. A.
    Oyen, W. J. G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (11) : 1650 - 1655
  • [8] 18F-FDG Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Glycolytic Activity of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer: Adding Value to Clinical Staging
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Alvarez, Ana C. Lara
    Minh-Tam Truong
    Mercier, Gustavo
    Cook, Earl F.
    Subramaniam, Rathan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (05) : 709 - 715
  • [9] Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection
    Downey, RJ
    Akhurst, T
    Gonen, M
    Vincent, A
    Bains, MS
    Larson, S
    Rusch, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (16) : 3255 - 3260
  • [10] Assessment of Chemotherapy Response in Colorectal Liver Metastases in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection and the Correlation to Pathologic Residual Viable Tumor
    Egger, Michael E.
    Cannon, Robert M.
    Metzger, Tiffany L.
    Nowacki, Michael
    Kelly, Larry
    Tatum, Cliff
    Scoggins, Charles R.
    Callender, Glenda G.
    McMasters, Kelly M.
    Martin, Robert C. G., II
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (04) : 845 - 856