Application of a health technology assessment framework to digital health technologies that manage chronic disease: a systematic review

被引:12
作者
von Huben, Amy [1 ]
Howell, Martin [1 ]
Carrello, Joseph [1 ]
Norris, Sarah [1 ]
Wortley, Sally [2 ]
Ritchie, Angus [3 ,4 ]
Howard, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Australian Dept Hlth Canberra, Consumer Evidence & Engagement Unit, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Concord Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Hlth Informat Unit, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Health technology assessment; Digital health; Remote monitoring; Evaluation frameworks; Chronic disease;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462321001665
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background As health services increasingly make investment decisions in digital health technologies (DHTs), a DHT-specific and comprehensive health technology assessment (HTA) process is crucial in assessing value-for-money. Research in DHTs is ever-increasing, but whether it covers the content required for HTA is unknown. Objectives To summarize current trends in primary research on DHTs that manage chronic disease at home, particularly the coverage of content recommended for DHT-specific and comprehensive HTA. Methods Medline, Embase, Econlit, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library (1 January 2015 to 20 March 2020) were searched for primary research studies using keywords related to DHT and HTA domains. Studies were assessed for coverage of the most frequently recommended content to be considered in a nine domain DHT-specific HTA previously developed. Results A total of 178 DHT interventions were identified, predominantly randomized controlled trials targeting cardiovascular disease/diabetes in high- to middle-income countries. A coverage assessment of the cardiovascular and diabetes DHT studies (112) revealed less than half covered DHT-specific content in all but the health problem domain. Content common to all technologies but essential for DHTs was covered by more than half the studies in all domains except for the effectiveness and ethical analysis domains. Conclusions Although DHT research is increasing, it is not covering all the content recommended for a DHT-specific and comprehensive HTA. The inability to conduct such an HTA may lead to health services making suboptimal investment decisions. Measures to increase the quality of trial design and reporting are required in DHT primary research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2020, CHRON DIS OV
[2]  
European Network For Health Technology Assessment, 2016, HTA COR MOD VERS 3 0
[3]   CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and Standardizing Evaluation Reports of Web-based and Mobile Health Interventions [J].
Eysenbach, Gunther .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (04)
[4]  
Forsyth JR., 2021, JMIR DIABETES, V6, pe23687
[5]   What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions [J].
Iribarren, Sarah J. ;
Cato, Kenrick ;
Falzon, Louise ;
Stone, Patricia W. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02)
[6]  
Kidholm K, 2018, APPL HEALTH ECON HEA, V16, P167, DOI 10.1007/s40258-017-0351-9
[7]   A MODEL FORASSESSMENT OF TELEMEDICINE APPLICATIONS: MAST [J].
Kidholm, Kristian ;
Ekeland, Anne Granstrom ;
Jensen, Lise Kvistgaard ;
Rasmussen, Janne ;
Pedersen, Claus Duedal ;
Bowes, Alison ;
Flottorp, Signe Agnes ;
Bech, Mickael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (01) :44-51
[8]  
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK), 2021, EV STAND FRAM DIG HE
[9]   The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration [J].
O'Rourke, Brian ;
Oortwijn, Wija ;
Schuller, Tara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 36 (03) :187-190
[10]  
Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71]