Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments

被引:33
作者
Beau, Aurelien [1 ]
Bossard, Denis [2 ]
Gebeile-Chauty, Sarah [3 ]
机构
[1] Fac Odontol, Lyon, France
[2] Ctr Med Imaging Mermoz, Lyon, France
[3] Fac Odontol, Dept Orthodont, Lyon, France
关键词
APPLIANCES; SUSCEPTIBILITY; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cju020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Orthodontic appliances are often removed before magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans because they are known to produce artefacts. The purpose of this study was to find the exact indications for removal of various fixed attachments when imaging four specific areas of the head and neck. Materials/Methods: Sixty patients requiring an MRI scan of the head for medical reasons volunteered for this investigation. One of four different types of fixed attachments (stainless steel brackets, titanium brackets, ceramic brackets with metal slots, and stainless steel retainers) were assigned to a patient. Each patient had two scans at 1.5 T: with an 'empty wax jig' and with a wax jig including the attachment. Archwires were not investigated as they are easily removed before a scan. Two radiologists evaluated the scans of each patient and each of the four areas under investigation: maxillary sinus, oral cavity, temporomandibular joints, and posterior cerebral fossa. Results: Stainless steel brackets always caused non-interpretability of all anatomic areas (100 per cent). Titanium brackets, ceramic brackets with metal slots, and stainless steel retainers caused artefact in the oral cavity only (for 20, 16.65, and 86.65 per cent of the subjects). Conclusions/Implications: Our results show that ceramic brackets with metal slots and titanium brackets do not always have to be removed before MRI scans of the head and neck, depending on the area under investigation. Metal fixed retainers should only be removed if the oral cavity itself is under investigation. Stainless steel brackets should always be removed before MRI scans of the head and neck.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region [J].
Abbaszadeh, K ;
Heffez, LB ;
Mafee, MF .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2000, 89 (06) :759-765
[2]   CORRELATION BETWEEN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING DISTURBANCES AND THE MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITY OF DENTAL MATERIALS [J].
BEUF, O ;
LISSAC, M ;
CREMILLIEUX, Y ;
BRIGUET, A .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1994, 10 (04) :265-268
[3]  
Brown M.A., 1999, MRI BASIC PRINCIPLES
[4]  
Costa ALF, 2009, MED ORAL PATOL ORAL, V14, pE278
[5]  
Destine Darline, 2008, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi, V52, P205, DOI 10.2186/jjps.52.205
[6]   Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material [J].
Eggers, G ;
Rieker, M ;
Kress, B ;
Fiebach, J ;
Dickhaus, H ;
Hassfeld, S .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2005, 18 (02) :103-111
[7]   Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images [J].
Elison, J. Matthew ;
Leggitt, V. Leroy ;
Thomson, Matthew ;
Oyoyo, Udo ;
Wycliffee, N. Dan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 134 (04) :563-572
[8]  
FACHE JS, 1987, AM J NEURORADIOL, V8, P837
[9]   MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: Te effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters [J].
Ganapathi, M ;
Joseph, G ;
Savage, R ;
Jones, AR ;
Timms, B ;
Lyons, K .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2002, 27B (02) :165-170
[10]   DENTAL MATERIAL ARTIFACTS ON MR IMAGES [J].
HINSHAW, DB ;
HOLSHOUSER, BA ;
ENGSTROM, HIM ;
TJAN, AHL ;
CHRISTIANSEN, EL ;
CATELLI, WF .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (03) :777-779