What knowledge do early childhood teachers use during literacy instruction? Using stimulated recall to investigate an unexplored phenomenon

被引:5
作者
Schachter, Rachel E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Coll Educ & Human Sci, Dept Child Youth & Family Studies, 261 Louise Pound Hall, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
Emergent literacy; Early childhood teachers; Knowledge; Pedagogical reasoning; Stimulated recall; CHILDRENS LANGUAGE; LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES; BELIEFS; EXPERIENCES; EDUCATION; COMPREHENSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11145-022-10254-w
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study utilized a novel phenomenological approach with a stimulated recall procedure to understand the pedagogical reasoning of eight early child teachers during the enactment of literacy instruction in whole-group meeting and language arts activities. This approach to investigating knowledge-in contrast to more traditional conceptualizations of knowledge-focused on knowledge use as a process and prioritized teachers' perspectives on knowledge used to enact literacy instruction in their own classrooms. Additionally, it allowed for a more nuanced investigation of the role of setting and teacher characteristics that are often examined in association with literacy instruction (e.g., degree attainment, years of experience, curriculum, instructional activity). Six types of knowledge were used by teachers in their pedagogical reasoning. In order of frequency of use these were knowledge of: goals for instruction, children, feelings, school environment, developing skills, and past experiences. Importantly, teachers made more references to knowledge derived from their immediate contexts as compared to decontextualized knowledge. Implications for understanding connections between knowledge and literacy instruction are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:2177 / 2200
页数:24
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, IDENTIFYING CRITICAL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel
  • [3] Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry
    Averill, JB
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (06) : 855 - 866
  • [4] Teacher knowledge: What is it? How do we uncover it? What are its implications for schooling?
    Ben-Peretz, Miriam
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 27 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [5] Borko H., 1996, Handbook of Educational Psychology, P673, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203053874
  • [6] Relating prekindergarten teacher beliefs and knowledge to children's language and literacy development
    Cash, Anne H.
    Cabell, Sonia Q.
    Hamre, Bridget K.
    DeCoster, Jamie
    Pianta, Robert C.
    [J]. TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2015, 48 : 97 - 105
  • [7] Clandinin J., 1988, J EDUC THOUGHT, V22, P269
  • [8] Clark C. M., 1977, RES TEACHING, P231
  • [9] Resources, instruction, and research
    Cohen, DK
    Raudenbush, SW
    Ball, DL
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2003, 25 (02) : 119 - 142
  • [10] Corbin J., 2008, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, V3rd ed., DOI [10.4135/9781452230153, DOI 10.4135/9781452230153]