Is Mindfulness a Noticeable Quality? Development and Validation of the Observed Mindfulness Measure

被引:2
作者
Bartlett, Larissa [1 ,2 ]
Martin, Angela J. [1 ,3 ]
Bruno, Raimondo [4 ]
Kilpatrick, Michelle [1 ]
Sanderson, Kristy [1 ,5 ]
Neil, Amanda L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Wicking Dementia Res & Educ Ctr, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[3] Pracademia Pty Ltd, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Sch Med, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[5] Univ East Anglia, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Mindfulness; Social behaviour; Measurement; Observer-reports; SELF-OTHER AGREEMENT; PRESENT-MOMENT AWARENESS; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; SOCIAL MINDFULNESS; STRESS REDUCTION; EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE; INFORMANT-REPORTS; PERSPECTIVE; INVENTORY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-021-09936-6
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This paper presents the psychometric development of a new observer-report research questionnaire for assessing aspects of an individual's mindfulness that are noticeable to others. Items from five established self-report mindfulness scales were re-worded for observer-report, and 30 were endorsed for potential inclusion by an expert panel (n = 5). Factor analytic and item response theory models were used to test item and scale psychometrics with data (N = 494) in three independent samples. A nine-item, three-factor scale with good fit indices was determined (RMSEA = 0.04, CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99). The instrument provides an overall score for observed mindful behaviours and subscale scores for observed attentiveness, awareness and acceptance. Within-subject test-retest reliability was strong (ICC 0.91) and agreement between observed mindful behaviours and self-reported mindfulness was adequate (ICC 0.45). Validity tests showed concordance between the new scale and self-reported mindfulness within the selected nomological network constructs (emotional intelligence, empathy and avoidant behaviours). Responsiveness was indicated but unconfirmed in data from a randomized controlled trial of low-dose mindfulness training. The Observed Mindfulness Measure (OMM) is a quantitative instrument that can provide an additional data source to strengthen self-reported findings in mindfulness research. With some further refinement this new instrument can advance research into whether and how mindfulness training might make a noticeable difference in social and organizational domains.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 185
页数:21
相关论文
共 113 条
[41]  
Fu R., 2013, Methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews
[42]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRAITS - PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH INTERJUDGE AGREEMENT [J].
FUNDER, DC ;
DOBROTH, KM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (02) :409-418
[43]   CONSENSUS, SELF-OTHER AGREEMENT, AND ACCURACY IN PERSONALITY JUDGMENT - AN INTRODUCTION [J].
FUNDER, DC ;
WEST, SG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1993, 61 (04) :457-476
[44]  
Garland Eric L, 2017, Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks), V1, DOI 10.1177/2470547017711912
[45]   Testing the mindfulness-to-meaning theory: Evidence for mindful positive emotion regulation from a reanalysis of longitudinal data [J].
Garland, Eric L. ;
Hanley, Adam W. ;
Goldin, Phillipe R. ;
Gross, James J. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (12)
[46]   Intimate partners’ perspectives on the relational effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction training: A qualitative research study [J].
Gillespie B. ;
Davey M.P. ;
Flemke K. .
Contemporary Family Therapy, 2015, 37 (4) :396-407
[47]   What Can We Learn from Randomized Clinical Trials About the Construct Validity of Self-Report Measures of Mindfulness? A Meta-Analysis [J].
Goldberg, Simon B. ;
Tucker, Raymond P. ;
Greene, Preston A. ;
Simpson, Tracy L. ;
Hoyt, William T. ;
Kearney, David J. ;
Davidson, Richard J. .
MINDFULNESS, 2019, 10 (05) :775-785
[48]   Is mindfulness research methodology improving over time? A systematic review [J].
Goldberg, Simon B. ;
Tucker, Raymond P. ;
Greene, Preston A. ;
Simpson, Tracy L. ;
Kearney, David J. ;
Davidson, Richard J. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (10)
[49]   Contemplating Mindfulness at Work: An Integrative Review [J].
Good, Darren J. ;
Lyddy, Christopher J. ;
Glomb, Theresa M. ;
Bono, Joyce E. ;
Brown, Kirk Warren ;
Duffy, Michelle K. ;
Baer, Ruth A. ;
Brewer, Judson A. ;
Lazar, Sara W. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2016, 42 (01) :114-142
[50]  
Grossman P., 2018, POROSITY SUBJECT OBJ, DOI [10.31231/osf.io/3hqg8, DOI 10.31231/OSF.IO/3HQG8]