Assessment of speech recognition abilities in quiet and in noise: a comparison between self-administered home testing and testing in the clinic for adult cochlear implant users

被引:23
作者
de Graaff, Feike [1 ]
Huysmans, Elke [1 ]
Merkus, Paul [1 ]
Goverts, S. Theo [1 ]
Smits, Cas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg Ear & Hearing, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, De Boelelaan 1117,POB 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cochlear implant; self-administered home tests; speech recognition; consonant-vowel-consonant; digits-in-noise; audio cable; direct connect; RECEPTION THRESHOLD; SENTENCE MATERIALS; RECIPIENTS; TELEHEALTH; PERCEPTION; EFFICIENT; HEARING; DIGITS;
D O I
10.1080/14992027.2018.1506168
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Self speech recognition tests in quiet and noise at home are compared to the standard tests performed in the clinic. Potential effects of stimuli presentation modes (loudspeaker or audio cable) and assessment (clinician or self-assessment at home) on test results were investigated. Speech recognition in quiet was assessed using the standard Dutch test with monosyllabic words. Speech recognition in noise was assessed with the digits-in-noise test. Sixteen experienced CI users (aged between 44 and 83 years) participated. No significant difference was observed in speech recognition in quiet between and presentation modes. Speech recognition in noise was significantly better with the audio cable than with the loudspeaker. There was no significant difference in speech recognition in quiet at 65 dB and in speech recognition in noise between self-assessment at home and testing in the clinic. At 55 dB, speech recognition assessed at home was slightly but significantly better than that assessed in the clinic. The results demonstrate that it is feasible for experienced CI users to perform self-administered speech recognition tests at home. Self-assessment by CI users of speech recognition in quiet and noise within the home environment could serve as an alternative to the tests performed in the clinic.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 880
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]   Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants [J].
Ramos, Angel ;
Rodriguez, Carina ;
Martinez-Beneyto, Paz ;
Perez, Daniel ;
Gault, Alexandre ;
Carlos Falcon, Juan ;
Boyle, Patrick .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2009, 129 (05) :533-540
[12]   Remote intraoperative monitoring during cochlear implant surgery is feasible and efficient [J].
Shapiro, William H. ;
Huang, Tina ;
Shaw, Theresa ;
Roland, J. Thomas, Jr. ;
Lalwani, Anil K. .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2008, 29 (04) :495-498
[13]   Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units [J].
Sherbecoe, RL ;
Studebaker, GA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (08) :442-448
[14]   The digits-in-noise test: Assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise [J].
Smits, Cas ;
Goverts, S. Theo ;
Festen, Joost M. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 133 (03) :1693-1706
[15]   A RATIONALIZED ARCSINE TRANSFORM [J].
STUDEBAKER, GA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1985, 28 (03) :455-462
[16]   Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold [J].
Versfeld, NJ ;
Daalder, L ;
Festen, JM ;
Houtgast, T .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 107 (03) :1671-1684
[17]   Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients [J].
Wesarg, Thomas ;
Wasowski, Arkadiusz ;
Skarzynski, Henryk ;
Ramos, Angel ;
Falcon Gonzalez, Juan Carlos ;
Kyriafinis, George ;
Junge, Friederike ;
Novakovich, Allan ;
Mauch, Herbert ;
Laszig, Roland .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2010, 130 (12) :1379-1388
[18]   Learning effects associated with repeated word-recognition measures using sentence materials [J].
Wilson, RH ;
Bell, TS ;
Koslowski, JA .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 40 (04) :329-336
[19]   Content and Procedural Learning in Repeated Sentence Tests of Speech Perception [J].
Yund, E. William ;
Woods, David L. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (06) :769-778