Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation

被引:14
作者
Nishio, Motohide [1 ]
Satoh, Masahiro [1 ]
机构
[1] NARO Inst Livestock & Grassland Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050901, Japan
关键词
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; GENOTYPE-IMPUTATION; BREEDING PROGRAMS; POPULATIONS; GROWTH; CATTLE; SELECTION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-015-0091-y
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Genetic effects are often modeled as additively acting marker allele effects. However, the actual mode of biological action can differ from this assumption. Many livestock traits exhibit genomic imprinting, which may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits. Here, we present two statistical models of GBLUP including imprinting effects (GBLUP-I) on the basis of genotypic values (GBLUP-I1) and gametic values (GBLUP-I2). The performance of these models for the estimation of variance components and prediction of genetic values across a range of genetic variations was evaluated in simulations. Results: Estimates of total genetic variances and residual variances with GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were close to the true values and the regression coefficients of total genetic values on their estimates were close to 1. Accuracies of estimated total genetic values in both GBLUP-I methods increased with increasing degree of imprinting and broad-sense heritability. When the imprinting variances were equal to 1.4% to 6.0% of the phenotypic variances, the accuracies of estimated total genetic values with GBLUP-I1 exceeded those with GBLUP by 1.4% to 7.8%. In comparison with GBLUP-I1, the superiority of GBLUP-I2 over GBLUP depended strongly on degree of imprinting and difference in genetic values between paternal and maternal alleles. When paternal and maternal alleles were predicted (phasing accuracy was equal to 0.979), accuracies of the estimated total genetic values in GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were 1.7% and 1.2% lower than when paternal and maternal alleles were known. Conclusions: This simulation study shows that GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 can accurately estimate total genetic variance and perform well for the prediction of total genetic values. GBLUP-I1 is preferred for genomic evaluation, while GBLUP-I2 is preferred when the imprinting effects are large, and the genetic effects differ substantially between sexes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [11] Imumorin Ikhide G., 2011, Frontiers in Genetics, V2, P44, DOI 10.3389/fgene.2011.00044
  • [12] RESTRICTED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION OF VARIANCE-COMPONENTS FOR UNIVARIATE ANIMAL-MODELS USING SPARSE-MATRIX TECHNIQUES AND AVERAGE INFORMATION
    JOHNSON, DL
    THOMPSON, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1995, 78 (02) : 449 - 456
  • [13] A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions
    Lund, Mogens S.
    de Roos, Adrianus P. W.
    de Vries, Alfred G.
    Druet, Tom
    Ducrocq, Vincent
    Fritz, Sebastien
    Guillaume, Francois
    Guldbrandtsen, Bernt
    Liu, Zenting
    Reents, Reinhard
    Schrooten, Chris
    Seefried, Franz
    Su, Guosheng
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
  • [14] Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs
    Mc Hugh, N.
    Meuwissen, T. H. E.
    Cromie, A. R.
    Sonesson, A. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (08) : 4109 - 4118
  • [15] A census of mammalian imprinting
    Morison, IM
    Ramsay, JP
    Spencer, HG
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2005, 21 (08) : 457 - 465
  • [16] Parent-of-origin effects cause genetic variation in pig performance traits
    Neugebauer, N.
    Luther, H.
    Reinsch, N.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2010, 4 (05) : 672 - 681
  • [17] Evidence for parent-of-origin effects on genetic variability of beef traits
    Neugebauer, N.
    Raeder, I.
    Schild, H. J.
    Zimmer, D.
    Reinsch, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (02) : 523 - 532
  • [18] Parameters affecting genome simulation for evaluating genomic selection method
    Nishio, Motohide
    Satoh, Masahiro
    [J]. ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2014, 85 (10) : 879 - 887
  • [19] Including Dominance Effects in the Genomic BLUP Method for Genomic Evaluation
    Nishio, Motohide
    Satoh, Masahiro
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [20] Allelic expression of IGF2 in marsupials and birds
    O'Neill, MJ
    Ingram, RS
    Vrana, PB
    Tilghman, SM
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT GENES AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 210 (01) : 18 - 20