External validation of a prognostic model based on total tumor load of sentinel lymph node for early breast cancer patients

被引:9
作者
Pinero-Madrona, Antonio [1 ]
Ripoll-Orts, Francisco [2 ]
Ignacio Sanchez-Mendez, Jose [3 ]
Chaves-Benito, Asuncion [4 ]
Rodrigo Gomez-de la Barcena, Maximiliano [5 ]
Calatrava-Fons, Ana [6 ]
Menjon-Beltran, Salomon [7 ]
Peg-Camara, Vicente [8 ]
机构
[1] Virgen de La Arrixaca Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Breast Canc Unit, Ctra Madrid Cartagena S-N, Murcia 30120, Spain
[2] La Fe Univ & Polytech Hosp, Breast Canc Unit, Valencia, Spain
[3] La Paz Univ Hosp, Breast Unit, Madrid, Spain
[4] JM Morales Meseguer Hosp, Pathol Dept, Murcia, Spain
[5] Burgos Univ Hosp, Pathol Dept, Burgos, Spain
[6] Fdn Inst Oncol, Pathol Dept, Valencia, Spain
[7] Virgen de Las Nieves Hosp, Oncol Gynaecol Unit, Granada, Spain
[8] Vall DHebron Univ Hosp, Pathol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Breast cancer; Prognosis; Sentinel lymph node; Total tumor load; Model validation; NUCLEIC-ACID AMPLIFICATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PREDICTION; METASTASIS; INDEX; NOMOGRAM; SURVIVAL; BIOPSY; ASSAY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-020-05623-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background A prognostic model based on the results of molecular analysis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is needed to replace the information that staging the entire axilla provided. The aim of the study is to conduct an external validation of a previously developed model for the prediction of 5-year DFS in a group of breast cancer patients that had undergone SLN biopsy assessed by the One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) method. Methods We collected retrospective data of 889 patients with breast cancer, who had not received systemic treatment before surgery, and who underwent SLN biopsy and evaluation of all SLN by OSNA. The discrimination ability of the model was assessed by the area under the ROC curve (AUC ROC), and its calibration by comparing 5-years DFS Kaplan-Meier estimates in quartile groups of model predicted probabilities (MPP). Results The AUC ROC ranged from 0.78 (at 2 years) to 0.73 (at 5 years) in the training set, and from 0.78 to 0.71, respectively, in the validation set. The MPP allowed to distinguish four groups of patients with heterogeneous DFS (log-rank test p < 0.0001). In the highest risk group, the HR were 6.04 [95% CI 2.70, 13.48] in the training set and 4.79 [2.310, 9.93] in the validation set. Conclusions The model for the prediction of 5-year DFS was successfully validated using the most stringent form of validation, in centers different from those involved in the development of the model. The external validation of the model confirms its utility for the prediction of 5-year DFS and the usefulness of the TTL value as a prognostic variable.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Can We Skip Intraoperative Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Nodes? Nomogram Predicting Involvement of Three or More Axillary Lymph Nodes before Breast Cancer Surgery [J].
Ahn, Soo Kyung ;
Kim, Min Kyoon ;
Kim, Jongjin ;
Lee, Eunshin ;
Yoo, Tae-Kyung ;
Lee, Han-Byoel ;
Kang, Young Joon ;
Kim, Jisun ;
Moon, Hyeong-Gon ;
Chang, Jung Min ;
Cho, Nariya ;
Moon, Woo Kyung ;
Park, In Ae ;
Noh, Dong-Young ;
Han, Wonshik .
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 49 (04) :1088-1096
[2]  
Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-5
[4]   The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging [J].
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Greene, Frederick L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. ;
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. ;
Brookland, Robert K. ;
Meyer, Laura ;
Gress, Donna M. ;
Byrd, David R. ;
Winchester, David P. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) :93-99
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[6]   THE NOTTINGHAM-PROGNOSTIC-INDEX APPLIED TO 9,149 PATIENTS FROM THE STUDIES OF THE DANISH-BREAST-CANCER-COOPERATIVE-GROUP (DBCG) [J].
BALSLEV, I ;
AXELSSON, CK ;
ZEDELER, K ;
RASMUSSEN, BB ;
CARSTENSEN, B ;
MOURIDSEN, HT .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 32 (03) :281-290
[7]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-H
[9]   Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
Ogundimu, Emmanuel O. ;
Cook, Jonathan A. ;
Le Manach, Yannick ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (23) :4124-4135
[10]   Prognostic factors in breast cancer: the predictive value of the Nottingham Prognostic Index in patients with a long-term follow-up that were treated in a single institution [J].
D'Eredita, G ;
Giardina, C ;
Martellotta, M ;
Natale, T ;
Ferrarese, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (05) :591-596