Physical and chemical comparison of soot in hydrocarbon and biodiesel fuel diffusion flames: A study of model and commercial fuels

被引:48
作者
Maricq, M. Matti [1 ]
机构
[1] Ford Motor Co, Res & Adv Engn, Dearborn, MI 48121 USA
关键词
Soot; Diffusion flame; Biodiesel; Particle size distribution; Laser ablation mass spectrometry; GENERATING PARTICLE BEAMS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; METHYL-ESTERS; CONTROLLED DIMENSIONS; PRECURSOR PARTICLES; AERODYNAMIC LENSES; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; ORGANIC-CARBON; DIESEL SOOT; NANOPARTICLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.022
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Data are presented to compare soot formation in both surrogate and practical fatty acid methyl ester biodiesel and petroleum fuel diffusion flames. The approach here uses differential mobility analysis to follow the size distributions and electrical charge of soot particles as they evolve in the flame, and laser ablation particle mass spectrometry to elucidate their composition. Qualitatively, these soot properties exhibit a remarkably similar development along the flames. The size distributions begin as a single mode of precursor nanoparticles, evolve through a bimodal phase marking the onset of aggregate formation, and end in a self preserving mode of fractal-like particles. Both biodiesel and hydrocarbon fuels yield a common soot composition dominated by CxHy+ ions, stabilomer PAHs, and fullerenes in the positive ion mass spectrum, and C-x(-) and C2xH- in the negative ion spectrum. These ion intensities initially grow with height in the diffusion flames, but then decline during later stages, consistent with soot carbonization. There are important quantitative differences between fuels. The surrogate biodiesel fuel methyl butanoate substantially reduces soot levels, but soot formation and evolution in this flame are delayed relative to both soy and petroleum fuels. In contrast, soots from soy and hexadecane flames exhibit nearly quantitative agreement in their size distribution and composition profiles with height, suggesting similar soot precursor chemistry. (C) 2010 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 116
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 2009011792 SAE
[2]   Detailed kinetic modeling of soot aggregate formation in laminar premixed flames [J].
Balthasar, M ;
Frenklach, M .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2005, 140 (1-2) :130-145
[3]   A computational study of the thermal ionization of soot particles and its effect on their growth in laminar premixed flames [J].
Balthasar, M ;
Mauss, F ;
Wang, H .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2002, 129 (1-2) :204-216
[4]   Simultaneous detection of two types of soot precursor particles using photoionization mass spectrometry [J].
Baquet, Tania Gonzalez ;
Grotheer, Horst-Henning ;
Aigner, Manfred .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2007, 21 (24) :4060-4064
[5]   The existence of young soot in the exhaust of inverse diffusion flames [J].
Blevins, LG ;
Fletcher, RA ;
Benner, BA ;
Steel, EB ;
Mulholland, GW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2002, 29 :2325-2333
[6]   Impact of biodiesel blending on diesel soot and the regeneration of particulate filters [J].
Boehman, AL ;
Song, J ;
Alam, M .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2005, 19 (05) :1857-1864
[7]   Molecular species adsorbed on soot particles issued from low sooting methane and acetylene laminar flames: A laser-based experiment [J].
Bouvier, Y. ;
Mihesan, C. ;
Ziskind, M. ;
Therssen, E. ;
Focsa, C. ;
Pauwels, J. F. ;
Desgroux, P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2007, 31 :841-849
[8]   Size-range analysis of diesel soot with ultra-small angle X-ray scattering [J].
Braun, A ;
Huggins, FE ;
Seifert, S ;
Ilavsky, J ;
Shah, N ;
Kelly, KE ;
Sarofim, A ;
Huffman, GP .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2004, 137 (1-2) :63-72
[9]   MECHANISMS OF SOOT NUCLEATION IN FLAMES - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
CALCOTE, HF .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1981, 42 (03) :215-242
[10]   Design and evaluation of a nanometer aerosol differential mobility analyzer (Nano-DMA) [J].
Chen, DR ;
Pui, DYH ;
Hummes, D ;
Fissan, H ;
Quant, FR ;
Sem, GJ .
JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 1998, 29 (5-6) :497-509