Giving up the ghost: Findings on fathers and social work from a study of pre-birth child protection

被引:12
作者
Critchley, Ariane [1 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Room 4-B-16,Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Fathers; fatherhood; child protection; infant removal; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; ENGAGING FATHERS; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1177/14733250211019463
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article reports findings from an ethnographic study of pre-birth child protection, conducted in an urban Scottish setting. The study was designed to explore the interactions between practitioners and families in the context of child protection involvement during a pregnancy. This research aimed to understand the activities that constituted pre-birth child protection assessment, and the meaning attached to those activities by social workers and expectant parents. Very different perspectives on fathers and fatherhood emerged through the study. Fathers shared their feelings of familial tenderness in the context of research interviews. Yet social workers often focused on the risks that the fathers posed. This focus on risk led professionals to ignore or exclude fathers in significant ways. Fathers were denied opportunities to take an active role in their families and care planning for their infants, whilst mothers were over-responsibilised. Children meanwhile were potentially denied the relationship, care and identity benefits of involved fatherhood. This article shows how pre-birth child protection processes and practice can function so as to limit the contribution of expectant fathers. The way that fathers and fathering are understood continues to be a wider problem for social work, requiring development through research and practice. This study was not immune to the challenge of involving men in social work research in meaningful ways. Nevertheless, the findings highlight how participation in social work research can create a forum for fathers to share their concerns, and the importance of their perspective for practice.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 601
页数:22
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Alrouh B., 2019, BORN CARE NEWBORNS I
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NAT GUID CHILD PROT
[3]  
Baltes P.B., 2015, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA, P844
[4]   Linked lives: Gender, family relations and recurrent care proceedings in England [J].
Bedston, Stuart ;
Philip, Georgia ;
Youansamouth, Lindsay ;
Clifton, John ;
Broadhurst, Karen ;
Brandon, Marian ;
Hu, Yang .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2019, 105
[5]  
Belderson P., 2009, DCSFPP129 DCFS
[6]   Conceptions, Norms, and Values in the Work of Child Protective Services with Families at Risk: An Analysis of Social Workers' Diaries [J].
Bjorkhagen Turesson, Annelie .
CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK JOURNAL, 2020, 48 (04) :369-379
[7]   Men as Fathers in Child Protection [J].
Brandon, Marian ;
Philip, Georgia ;
Clifton, John .
AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2019, 72 (04) :447-460
[8]  
Broadhurst K., 2017, VULN BIRTH MOTH REC
[9]  
Broadhurst K., 2018, BORN CAR NEWB BAB SU
[10]   Child removal as the gateway to further adversity: Birth mother accounts of the immediate and enduring collateral consequences of child removal [J].
Broadhurst, Karen ;
Mason, Claire .
QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 19 (01) :15-37