Spreadsheet application for radiology resident match rank list

被引:10
作者
Chew, FS [1 ]
Ochoa, ER [1 ]
Relyea-Chew, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
radiology residency; residency match; resident selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2004.12.018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objective. Enormous resources are spent on the selection process for radiology residency, yet agreement on criteria, process, and outcome remains elusive. The aim was to develop, implement, and evaluate a spreadsheet application that streamlined the creation of a match list for resident selection. Materials and Methods. The Department of Radiology's traditional procedure of screening, interviewing, and rating candidates was left intact because the selection committee could not reach consensus regarding possible improvements in the process or outcome measures. We developed a spreadsheet application that used the ratings of candidate desirability for our program from our preexisting process to create a tentative match list by adding a system of ordinal ranking and weighting. After 4 years of use, the fairness and usefulness of this application were evaluated by members of the selection committee by means of a survey. Results. The spreadsheet application was used to create tentative match lists for 4 years. The system eliminated ties among candidates on the preliminary match list and met the expectations of a majority of the selection committee members for fairness, objectivity, efficiency, and results. Conclusion. A spreadsheet application can streamline the process of resident selection without having to resolve underlying conflicts about selection criteria and outcome measures.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 384
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] How well does applicant rank order predict subsequent performance during radiology residency?
    Adusumilli, S
    Cohan, RH
    Marshall, KW
    Fitzgerald, JT
    Oh, MS
    Gross, BH
    Ellis, JH
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (08) : 635 - 640
  • [2] RELATIONSHIP OF PHYSICAL APPEARANCE AND PROFESSIONAL DEMEANOR TO INTERVIEW EVALUATIONS AND RANKINGS OF MEDICAL RESIDENCY APPLICANTS
    BOOR, M
    WARTMAN, SA
    REUBEN, DB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 113 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [3] Does medical school performance predict radiology resident performance?
    Boyse, TD
    Patterson, SK
    Cohan, RH
    Korobkin, M
    Fitzgerald, JT
    Oh, MS
    Gross, BH
    Quint, DJ
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (04) : 437 - 445
  • [4] SELECTING RADIOLOGY RESIDENT CANDIDATES
    CURTIS, DJ
    RIORDAN, DD
    CRUESS, DF
    BROWER, AC
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1989, 24 (04) : 324 - 330
  • [5] COMPUTER FACILITATION OF THE RESIDENT SELECTION PROCESS
    FRANK, MS
    SAGEL, SS
    KOEHLER, RE
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (09) : 1040 - 1043
  • [6] INFLUENCE OF THE INTERVIEW ON RANKING IN THE RESIDENCY SELECTION PROCESS
    GONG, H
    PARKER, NH
    APGAR, FA
    SHANK, C
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1984, 18 (05) : 366 - 369
  • [7] Grantham J R, 1993, Invest Radiol, V28, P99, DOI 10.1097/00004424-199301000-00034
  • [8] Are NBME examination scores useful in selecting radiology residency candidates?
    Gunderman, RB
    Jackson, VP
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (08) : 603 - 606
  • [9] LONGCOPE WT, 1903, B AYER CLIN LAB PENN, V1, P4
  • [10] Neural network and linear regression models in residency selection
    Pilon, S
    Tandberg, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 15 (04) : 361 - 364