Behaviour of footings on reinforced sand subjected to repeated loading - Comparing use of 3D and planar geotextile

被引:101
作者
Tafreshi, S. N. Moghaddas [1 ]
Dawson, A. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham Transportat Engn Ctr, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Laboratory test; Repeated loads; Strip footing; 3D and planar geotextile reinforcement; Footing settlement; Plastic shakedown; BEARING CAPACITY; STRIP FOUNDATION; MODEL; CLAY; PERFORMANCE; TESTS; EMBANKMENTS; SETTLEMENT; BEDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.007
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper describes a series of laboratory model tests performed on strip footings supported on 3D and planar geotextile-reinforced sand beds under a combination of static and repeated loads. Footing settlement due to initial static applied load and up to 20,000 subsequent load repetitions was recorded, until its value becomes stable or failure occurred due to excessive settlement. The response under the first few cycles was found to be a significant behavioral characteristic of footings under repeated loads. The influence of various amplitudes of repeated load on foundations containing different numbers of planar geotextile layers and different heights of the 3D geotextile reinforcement were investigated. Most of the observed responses show plastic shakedown developing - that is a stable, resilient response is observed once incremental plastic strains under each load repetition have ceased to accumulate. The results show that the maximum footing settlement due to repeated loading is comparable for either planar- or 3D-reinforced sand and much improved over the settlement of unreinforced sand. The efficiency of reinforcement in reducing the maximum footing settlement was decreased by increasing the mass of reinforcement in the sand. On the whole, the results indicate that, for the same mass of geotextile material used in the tests, the 3D geotextile reinforcement system behaves more effectively than planar reinforcement as a retardant for the effects of dynamic loading. Thus, a specific improvement in footing settlement can be achieved using a lesser quantity of 3D geotextile material compared to planar geotextile. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations [J].
Adams, MT ;
Collin, JG .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (01) :66-72
[2]  
AKINMUSURU JO, 1981, J GEOTECH ENG-ASCE, V107, P819
[3]   Bearing capacity of strip footings on sand slopes reinforced with geogrid and grid-anchor [J].
Alamshahi, Saeed ;
Hataf, Nader .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2009, 27 (03) :217-226
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1885, Application des potentials a l'etude de l'equilibre et du mouvement des solides elastuques
[5]   Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls [J].
Bathurst, R. J. ;
Nernheim, A. ;
Walters, D. L. ;
Allen, T. M. ;
Burgess, P. ;
Saunders, D. D. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 16 (01) :43-59
[6]   THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF GEOCELL FOUNDATION MATTRESSES SUPPORTING EMBANKMENTS OVER SOFT GROUND [J].
BUSH, DI ;
JENNER, CG ;
BASSETT, RH .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 1990, 9 (01) :83-98
[7]   PERFORMANCE OF A ROAD EMBANKMENT ON SOFT CLAY SUPPORTED ON A GEOCELL MATTRESS FOUNDATION [J].
COWLAND, JW ;
WONG, SCK .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 1993, 12 (08) :687-705
[8]  
CUNNY RW, 1961, ASTM SPECIAL TECHNIC, V305, P65
[9]   STRIP FOUNDATION ON GEOGRID-REINFORCED CLAY - BEHAVIOR UNDER CYCLIC LOADING [J].
DAS, BM ;
SHIN, EC .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 1994, 13 (10) :657-667
[10]  
Das BM, 1998, GEOTECH SP, P19