Further insights into normal aortic valve function: Role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area

被引:45
作者
Sripathi, VC
Kumar, RK
Balakrishnan, KR [1 ]
机构
[1] Ramachandra Med Coll, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Madras 600116, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Madras 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01518-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. This study aims to find the fundamental differences in the mechanism of opening and closing of a normal aortic valve and a valve with a stiff root, using a dynamic finite element model. Methods. A dynamic, finite element model with time varying pressure was used in this study. Shell elements with linear elastic properties for the leaflet and root were used. Two different cases were analyzed: (1) normal leaflets inside a compliant root, and (2) normal leaflets inside a stiff root. Results. A compliant aortic root contributes substantially to the smooth and symmetrical leaflet opening with minimal gradients. In contrast, the leaflet opening inside a stiff root is delayed, asymmetric, and wrinkled. However, this wrinkling is not associated with increased leaflet stresses. In compliant roots, the effective valve orifice area can substantially increase because of increased root pressure and transvalvular gradients. In stiff roots this effect is strikingly absent. Conclusions. A compliant aortic root contributes substantially to smooth and symmetrical leaflet opening with minimal gradients. The compliance also contributes much to the ability of the normal aortic valve to increase its effective valve orifice in response to physiologic demands of exercise. This effect is strikingly absent in stiff roots. (C) 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:844 / 851
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Beck A, 2001, J HEART VALVE DIS, V10, P1
[2]  
DEHART J, 2002, THESIS EINDHOVEN U T
[3]   Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size [J].
Eriksson, MJ ;
Rosfors, S ;
Rådegran, K ;
Brodin, LÅ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (04) :619-622
[4]   Dynamic analysis of the aortic valve using a finite element model [J].
Gnyaneshwar, R ;
Kumar, RK ;
Balakrishnan, KR .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (04) :1122-1129
[5]   Finite-element analysis of aortic valve-sparing: Influence of graft shape and stiffness [J].
Grande-Allen, KJ ;
Cochran, RP ;
Reinhall, PG ;
Kunzelman, KS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 48 (06) :647-659
[6]   Re-creation of sinuses is important for sparing the aortic valve: A finite element study [J].
Grande-Allen, KJ ;
Cochran, RP ;
Reinhall, PG ;
Kunzelman, KS .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 119 (04) :753-762
[7]   REGULATION OF THE AORTIC-VALVE OPENING - IN-VIVO DYNAMIC MEASUREMENT OF AORTIC-VALVE ORIFICE AREA [J].
HIGASHIDATE, M ;
TAMIYA, K ;
BEPPU, T ;
IMAI, Y .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 110 (02) :496-503
[8]  
Pang DC, 2000, J HEART VALVE DIS, V9, P9
[9]   Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaftet aortic valve: Review of subject and presentation of a new theory [J].
Robicsek, F ;
Thubrikar, MJ ;
Fokin, AA .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (04) :1346-1354
[10]   Role of sinus wall compliance in aortic leaflet function [J].
Robicsek, F ;
Thubrikar, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (08) :944-+