Quality improvement and process innovation of a firm facing reference price effects in a dynamic monopoly

被引:6
作者
Li, Shoude [1 ]
Li, Dong D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai 200052, Peoples R China
关键词
Product innovation; quality improvement; process innovation; reference price; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT INNOVATION; NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; CHOICE; MARKET; MODEL; COMPETITION; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2021.2011105
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we investigate a monopolist's efforts for product innovation (or quality improvement) and process innovation (or reducing marginal production cost) with reference price effects in a dynamic setting. The significant features of our work are: (i) a monopolist deals with customer behavior according to economic principles and determines the price of the product, besides, the monopolist carries out the activities of product and process innovation; (ii) the consumers' demand structure depends on product price, product quality and reference price, and takes a separable multiplicative way between the state variables (product quality and reference price) and the control variables (product price). Our main results suggest that (i) there exists unique saddle-point steady-state equilibrium under monopoly and social planning; (ii) as the memory parameter increases, it is very likely that the monopolist's steady-state effort for process innovation is greater than that for product innovation; (iii) the efforts for product and process innovation under social planning are greater than that under monopoly; (iv) although the price is still determined by the monopolist under the social planning, the price under the social planning is higher than that under monopoly and (v) there is a negative price-quality relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:3537 / 3556
页数:20
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment [J].
Athey, S ;
Schmutzler, A .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1995, 26 (04) :557-574
[2]   Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation [J].
Bonanno, G ;
Haworth, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1998, 16 (04) :495-510
[3]   Dynamic R&D with spillovers: Competition vs cooperation [J].
Cellini, Roberto ;
Lambertini, Luca .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2009, 33 (03) :568-582
[4]   RETRACTED: Construction of complex environmental art design system based on 3D virtual simulation technology (Retracted Article) [J].
Chen, Ruiyan ;
Sharma, Ashutosh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (SUPPL 1) :577-577
[5]   Dynamic quality policies with reference quality effects [J].
Chenavaz, Regis .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2017, 49 (32) :3156-3162
[6]   Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation [J].
Chenavaz, Regis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (03) :553-557
[7]   An analytical model of the relationship between product quality and advertising [J].
Chenavaz, Regis Y. ;
Jasimuddin, Sajjad M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 263 (01) :295-307
[8]   Risk attitude, product innovation, and firm growth. Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms [J].
Cucculelli, Marco ;
Ermini, Barbara .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 118 (02) :275-279
[9]   Product innovation incentives by an incumbent firm: A dynamic analysis [J].
Dawid, Herbert ;
Keoula, Michel Y. ;
Kopel, Michael ;
Kort, Peter M. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 117 :411-438
[10]   Quality and the diffusion of innovations [J].
El Ouardighi, F ;
Tapiero, CS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 106 (01) :31-38