Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery

被引:15
作者
Binkley, Jill M. [1 ]
Stratford, Paul [2 ]
Kirkpatrick, Stephanie [3 ]
Farley, Clara R. [4 ]
Okoli, Joel [5 ]
Gabram, Sheryl [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] TarningPoint Breast Canc Rehabil, 8010 Roswell Rd,Suite 120, Atlanta, GA 30350 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Morehouse Sch Med, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30310 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Emory Univ, Avon Comprehens Breast Ctr Grady, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Breast cancer rehabilitation; Disability; Function; Patient-reported outcome measure; PROSPECTIVE SURVEILLANCE MODEL; DASH OUTCOME MEASURE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SHOULDER PAIN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; DISABILITY INDEX; REHABILITATION; ARM; SURVIVORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clbc.2018.02.008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In an estimation of the reliability and validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) in women after breast cancer surgery, measures of function and impairment were obtained before and 2 weeks after surgery. Test retest reliability was acceptable. Convergent and discriminant construct validation findings suggested that the UEFI is an appropriate measure for estimating upper extremity activity limitations in this population. Background: Activity limitations as well as impairments such as pain, numbness, limitation of shoulder range of motion, and weakness are common and well documented during and after treatment for breast cancer. There is limited information regarding the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures of upper extremity activity limitation in this population. This study examined the reliability and validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) in patients after surgery for breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Measures of function, shoulder flexion range of motion, and pain were obtained for 53 women before and 2 weeks after surgery for breast cancer. To estimate UEFI test-retest reliability, a convenience sample of 20 patients was assessed on a second occasion within 48 hours of their 2-week postsurgery assessment. Convergent and discriminant construct validation methods were applied by examining correlations between UEFI scores and change scores with those of the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) 4 items, shoulder flexion range, and pain. Results: UEFI test-retest reliability was estimated to be 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.69, 0.94), and the standard error of measurement was 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 3.7, 7.1) scale points. The 90% confidence interval for a given UEFI score was +/- 7.9 and minimal detectable change at 90% confidence (MDC90) was +/- 11.1 points. UEFI correlations with the QuickDASH (cross-sectional 0.79 and longitudinal 0.62) were greater than with the FACT-B+4 and impairment measures. Conclusion: These results support and guide the use of the UEFI in patients after breast cancer surgery. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E1261 / E1267
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Validation of the FACT-B+4-UL questionnaire and exploration of its predictive value in women submitted to surgery for breast cancer [J].
Andrade Ortega, Juan Alfonso ;
Millan Gomez, Ana Pilar ;
Ribeiro Gonzalez, Marisa ;
Martinez Piro, Pilar ;
Jimenez Anula, Juan ;
Sanchez Andujar, Maria Belen .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2017, 148 (12) :555-558
[2]  
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P799
[3]   Patient perspectives on breast cancer treatment side effects and the prospective surveillance model for physical rehabilitation for women with breast cancer [J].
Binkley, Jill M. ;
Harris, Susan R. ;
Levangie, Pamela K. ;
Pearl, Marcia ;
Guglielmino, Janine ;
Kraus, Valerie ;
Rowden, Diana .
CANCER, 2012, 118 :2207-2216
[4]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[5]   Reliability and Validity of Two Versions of the Upper Extremity Functional Index [J].
Chesworth, Bert M. ;
Hamilton, Clayon B. ;
Walton, David M. ;
Benoit, Melissa ;
Blake, Tracy A. ;
Bredy, Heather ;
Burns, Cameron ;
Chan, Lianne ;
Frey, Elizabeth ;
Gillies, Graham ;
Gravelle, Teresa ;
Ho, Rick ;
Holmes, Robert ;
Lavallee, Roland L. J. ;
MacKinnon, Melanie ;
Merchant, Alishah ;
Sherman, Tammy ;
Spears, Kelly ;
Yardley, Darryl .
PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2014, 66 (03) :243-253
[6]   Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334
[7]   Disparities in breast cancer outcomes between Caucasian and African American women: a model for describing the relationship of biological and nonbiological factors [J].
Danforth, David N., Jr. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (03)
[8]   Test-retest and Internal Consistency of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure in Assessing Functional Status among Breast Cancer Survivors with Lymphedema [J].
Davies, Claire ;
Brockopp, Dorothy ;
Moe, Krista .
REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (01) :28-31
[9]   Internal Consistency of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure in Assessing Functional Status Among Breast Cancer Survivors [J].
Davies, Claire ;
Brockopp, Dorothy ;
Moe, Krista .
REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) :6-12
[10]   SIMILAR MOTOR RECOVERY OF UPPER AND LOWER-EXTREMITIES AFTER STROKE [J].
DUNCAN, PW ;
GOLDSTEIN, LB ;
HORNER, RD ;
LANDSMAN, PB ;
SAMSA, GP ;
MATCHAR, DB .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (06) :1181-1188