Chlorhexidine is not an essential component in alcohol-based surgical hand preparation: a comparative study of two handrubs based on a modified EN 12791 test protocol

被引:9
作者
Hennig, Thomas-Jorg [1 ]
Werner, Sebastian [2 ]
Naujox, Kathrin [2 ]
Arndt, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] B Braun Med AG, Ctr Excellence Infect Control, Seesatz 17, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland
[2] HygCen Germany GmbH, Bornhovedstr 78, D-19055 Schwerin, Germany
关键词
Surgical hand antisepsis; Surgical scrubbing; Chlorhexidine; Alcohol; Handrub evaluation; RESIDUAL ANTIMICROBIAL PROPERTIES; DISINFECTION; SCRUB; EFFICACY; RUBS; PERSISTENT; ANTISEPTICS; HYGIENE; AGENTS;
D O I
10.1186/s13756-017-0258-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Surgical hand preparation is an essential part of modern surgery. Both alcohol-based and antiseptic detergent-based hand preparation are recommended practices, with a trend towards use of alcohol based handrubs. However, discussion has arisen whether chlorhexidine is a required ingredient in highly efficacious alcohol-based formulations, in view of providing sustained antimicrobial efficacy. Methods: One alcohol-only formulation (product A), containing ethanol and n-propanol, and one formulation containing a chlorhexidine-ethanol combination (product B) were directly compared with each other using a modified test protocol based on European standard EN 12791 (2016) with 25 volunteers. The alcohol-only formulation (product A) was applied for only 90 s, the chlorhexidine-alcohol formulation (product B) for 180 s. Microbial log reduction factors were determined and statistically compared immediately after application and at 6 h under surgical gloves. Results: The alcohol-only formulation (product A) achieved mean log reduction factors of 1.96 +/- 1.06 immediately after application and 1.67 +/- 0.71 after 6 h. The chlorhexidine-alcohol combination (product B) achieved mean log reduction factors of 1.42 +/- 0.79 and 1.24 +/- 0.90 immediately and after 6 h, respectively. The values for product A were significantly greater than those for product B at both measured time points (p = 0.025 immediately after application and p = 0.01 after 6 h). Conclusions: An optimized alcohol-only formulation tested according to a modified EN 12791 protocol in 25 healthy volunteers outperformed a chlorhexidine-alcohol formulation both immediately after application and at 6 h under surgical gloves, despite a much shorter application time. Thus, optimized alcohol-only formulations do not require chlorhexidine to achieve potent immediate and sustained efficacy. In conclusion, chlorhexidine is not an essential component for alcohol-based surgical hand preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, FED REG
[2]  
[Anonymous], PREVENTION CONTROL N
[3]  
Association of perioperative Registered Nurses (AORN), 2004, AORN J, V79, P21
[4]  
Association of perioperative Registered Nurses (AORN), 2004, AORN J, V79, P29
[5]  
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses Recommended Practices Committee, 2004, AORN J, V79, P416
[6]  
ASTM, 2011, E111511 ASTM
[7]   SURGICAL SCRUB AND SKIN DISINFECTION [J].
AYLIFFE, GAJ .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1984, 5 (01) :23-27
[8]   In vivo evaluation of the persistant and residual antimicrobial properties of three hand-scrub and hand-rub regimes in a simulated surgical environment [J].
Beausoleil, C. M. ;
Paulson, D. S. ;
Bogert, A. ;
Lewis, G. S. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2012, 81 (04) :283-287
[9]   Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings - Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force [J].
Boyce, JM ;
Pittet, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2002, 30 (08) :S1-S46
[10]   Is Alcohol-Based Hand Disinfection Equivalent to Surgical Scrub Before Placing a Central Venous Catheter? [J].
Burch, Thomas Michael ;
Stanger, Brett ;
Mizuguchi, K. Annette ;
Zurakowski, David ;
Reid, Sean D. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 114 (03) :622-625