Screening for Depression in Advanced Disease: Psychometric Properties, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Two Items of the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS)

被引:15
作者
Antunes, Barbara [1 ]
Murtagh, Fliss [1 ]
Bausewein, Claudia [1 ,2 ]
Harding, Richard [1 ]
Higginson, Irene J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, Cicely Saunders Inst, London SE5 9PJ, England
[2] Klinikum Univ Munchen, Interdisziplinares Zentrum Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
关键词
Palliative care; hospice; depression; Palliative care Outcome Scale; screening; advanced disease; cutoffs; clinical practice; end-of-life care; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; VALIDATION; BREATHLESSNESS; VALIDITY; VERSION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.014
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Depression is common among patients with advanced disease but often difficult to detect. Objectives. To assess the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) (10 items) against the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-10 total score and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-Depression subscale total score and determine if the POS has appropriate items to screen for depression among people with advanced disease. Methods. This was a secondary analysis performed on five studies. Four psychometric properties were assessed: data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, and internal consistency (reliability). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the area under the curve. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false positive and negative rates, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were computed. Results. The overall sample had 416 patients from Germany and England: 144 had cancer and 267 had nonmalignant conditions. Prevalence of depression across the sample was 17.5%. Floor and ceiling effects were rare. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for POS items 7 and 8 summed, GDS-10 and HADS-Depression items varied: 0.61 (heart failure) and 0.80 (cancer). Two items combined (Item 7-feeling depressed and Item 8-feeling good about yourself) consistently presented the highest area under the ROC curve, ranging from 0.76 (95% CI 0.60, 0.93) (Germany, lung cancer) to 0.97 (95% CI 0.91, 1.0) (heart failure), highest negative predictive value, and lowest false negative rate. For the overall sample, the cutoff 2/3 presented a negative predictive value of 89.4% (95% CI 84.7, 92.8) and false negative rate of 10.6 (95% CI 7.2, 15.3). Conclusion. POS items 7 and 8 summed are potentially useful to screen for depression in advanced disease populations. (C) 2015 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 288
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Acuña E, 2004, ST CLASS DAT ANAL, P639
[2]  
Almeida OP, 1999, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V14, P858, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199910)14:10<858::AID-GPS35>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-8
[4]   Validation and clinical application of the German version of the palliative care outcome scale [J].
Bausewein, C ;
Fegg, M ;
Radbruch, L ;
Nauck, F ;
von Mackensen, S ;
Borasio, GD ;
Higginson, IJ .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 30 (01) :51-62
[5]   The use of two common palliative outcome measures in clinical care and research: A systematic review of POS and STAS [J].
Bausewein, C. ;
Le Grice, C. ;
Simon, S. T. ;
Higginson, I. J. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (04) :304-313
[6]   Understanding Breathlessness: Cross-Sectional Comparison of Symptom Burden and Palliative Care Needs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cancer [J].
Bausewein, Claudia ;
Booth, Sara ;
Gysels, Marjolein ;
Kuehnbach, Robert ;
Haberland, Birgit ;
Higginson, Irene J. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 13 (09) :1109-1118
[7]  
BJELLAND I, 2002, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V0052
[8]  
Clarke S P, 2000, Can J Nurs Res, V32, P109
[9]   SCREENING, DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF DEPRESSION IN ELDERLY PRIMARY-CARE ATTENDERS .1. THE ACCEPTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE 15-ITEM GERIATRIC DEPRESSION SCALE (GDS15) AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SHORT VERSIONS [J].
DATH, P ;
KATONA, P ;
MULLAN, E ;
EVANS, S ;
CORNELIUS, K .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1994, 11 (03) :260-266
[10]  
de Vet HCW., 2011, MEASUREMENT MED PRAC, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511996214, 10.1017/CBO9780511996214]