Dynamic exergy analysis: From industrial data to exergy flows

被引:8
作者
Michalakakis, Charalampos [1 ]
Cullen, Jonathan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Trumpington St, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
energy efficiency; exergy analysis; industrial data; industrial ecology; materials efficiency; Sankey diagrams; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; POWER; OIL; SUSTAINABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; DESTRUCTION; ELECTRICITY; FEEDSTOCKS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13168
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the power and transport sectors decarbonize, industrial emissions will become the main focus of decarbonization efforts. Exergy analysis provides a combined material and energy efficiency approach to assess industrial plants, both of which are necessary to tackle industrial emissions. Existing studies typically use simulated, static data that cannot inform real plant operators. This paper performs an exergy analysis on data spanning 2 years from 311 sensors of a real ammonia production site. We develop methods to overcome unique data challenges associated with real industrial data processing, visualize resource flows in Sankey diagrams, and estimate exergy indicators for both the steam methane reforming plant and its constituent processes. We evaluate average conventional and transit exergy efficiencies for the plant (71%, 15%), primary reformer (86%, 40%), secondary reformer (96%, 71%), high-temperature shift (99.7%, 77%), combustor (56%, 55%), and heat exchange section (85%, 82%). Overall exergy losses are 80 MW; the primary reformer and combustor are the two processes with the highest losses at 35 and 33 MW, respectively. Such an analysis can inform both improvement projects and performance finetuning of a real plant while being applicable to any industrial site. Increased availability of cheap wireless sensors and a shift to Industry 4.0 can enable higher resolution and real-time performance monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 26
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[21]  
Goodwin D. G., 2018, Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes
[22]  
Gruenwald L., 2007, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops IEEE Computer Society, P207
[23]  
Gudivada V., 2017, Int. J. Advan. Softw., V10, P1
[24]   Energy and exergy analysis of an indirect solar dryer based on a dynamic model [J].
Hatami, S. ;
Payganeh, G. ;
Mehrpanahi, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244
[25]   Leveraging material efficiency as an energy and climate instrument for heavy industries in the EU [J].
Hernandez, Ana Gonzalez ;
Cooper-Searle, Simone ;
Skelton, Alexandra C. H. ;
Cullen, Jonathan M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 120 :533-549
[26]   How resource-efficient is the global steel industry? [J].
Hernandez, Ana Gonzalez ;
Paoli, Leonardo ;
Cullen, Jonathan M. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 133 :132-145
[27]  
IEA, 2017, Energy technology perspectives 2017: Buildings-A source of enormous untapped efficiency potential, DOI 10.1787/energy_tech-2017-en
[28]   Control optimization to achieve energy-efficient operation of the air separation unit in oxy-fuel combustion power plants [J].
Jin, Bo ;
Zhao, Haibo ;
Zheng, Chuguang ;
Liang, Zhiwu .
ENERGY, 2018, 152 :313-321
[29]   Comprehensive exergy analysis of an industrial-scale yogurt production plant [J].
Jokandan, Majid Jafaryani ;
Aghbashlo, Mortaza ;
Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid .
ENERGY, 2015, 93 :1832-1851
[30]   Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts [J].
Kelly, S. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. ;
Morosuk, T. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) :384-391