Adolescents' use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender

被引:42
作者
Denton, Carolyn A. [1 ]
Wolters, Christopher A. [4 ]
York, Mary J. [2 ]
Swanson, Elizabeth [3 ]
Kulesz, Paulina A. [2 ]
Francis, David J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Reading comprehension; Metacognitive strategies; Adolescents; SELF-REGULATION; NOTE-TAKING; LEARNING-STRATEGIES; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; TEXT STRUCTURE; STUDENTS; INFERENCE; ACHIEVEMENT; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The goals of this study were to examine individual differences in adolescents' reading comprehension strategy use related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender and to investigate the factor structure and psychometric properties of a newly-developed scenario-based self-report survey. Participants were 1134 students in grades 7-12. The instrument measures four theoretically-consistent constructs related to strategies for (a) the Evaluation and Integration of current text information with previous text information and prior knowledge, (b) Note-Taking, (c) Regulation, and (d) Help-Seeking. The scales demonstrated adequate reliability and validity. Adequate comprehenders reported higher use of Evaluation/Integration and Regulation strategies than struggling comprehenders, while the use of Help-Seeking and Note-Taking did not differ between these groups. Students at higher grade levels reported greater use of Evaluation/Integration and Regulation strategies than those in lower grades. Females reported higher use of all strategy types than males. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 95
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Pre-service teachers' use of reading strategies in their own readings and future classrooms [J].
Akyol, Hayati ;
Ulusoy, Mustafa .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2010, 26 (04) :878-884
[2]   The path to competence: A lifespan developmental perspective on reading [J].
Alexander, PA .
JOURNAL OF LITERACY RESEARCH, 2005, 37 (04) :413-436
[3]   Motivation for reading comprehension [J].
Anmarkrud, Oistein ;
Braten, Ivar .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 19 (02) :252-256
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPEAKING WRITING REF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WOODCOCKJOHNSON TEST
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, TIM ACT AG ADV AD LI
[7]  
Azevedo R., 2004, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V30, P87, DOI 10.2190/DVWX-GM1T-6THQ-5WC7
[8]   The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age [J].
Barnes, MA ;
Dennis, M ;
HaefeleKalvaitis, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 61 (03) :216-241
[9]  
Botsas G., 2003, International Journal of Educational Research, V39, P477, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010, DOI 10.1016/J.IJER.2004.06.010]
[10]   Does the influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students' topic knowledge? [J].
Bråten, I ;
Samuelstuen, MS .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (02) :324-336