Clinical outcome comparison of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma surgical resection

被引:4
作者
Niu, Nan [1 ,2 ]
He, Yuhui [1 ,2 ]
Mou, Yiping [2 ]
Meng, Sijia [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Peng [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Yucheng [2 ]
Jin, Weiwei [2 ]
Lu, Chao [2 ]
Xu, Yunyun [2 ]
Zhu, Qicong [2 ]
Xia, Tao [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Second Clin Med Coll, Dept Surg, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Hangzhou Med Coll, Canc Ctr,Department of Gen Surg,Div Gastrointestin, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Bengbu Med Coll, Dept Surg, Bengbu, Peoples R China
[4] Qingdao Univ, Dept Surg, Qingdao, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
pancreatic cancer; laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy; laparoscopic RAMPS; chemotherapy; survivability;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.981591
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (LRAMPS) is a validated surgical treatment for patients with left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In addition, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDPS) has purported benefits. However, there is a limited analysis comparing the results between LRAMPS and LDPS. Thus, this study aims to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent LRAMPS and LDPS for PDAC treatment. Methods: Patients with left-sided PDAC that underwent LRAMPS or LDPS from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Demographic and clinic pathologic data were collected. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities were obtained. Results: The number of lymph nodes retrieved was significantly greater in the LRAMPS group than in the LDPS group. Several clinicopathological factors, including CA19-9 levels greater than 37 U/ml, positive lymph nodes, moderate to poor tumor differentiation, and peripancreas fat invasion, were associated with DFS. Moderate with poor tumor differentiation was associated with poor DFS (HR 0.568; 95% CI 0.373-0.921; P = 0.021). Levels of CA19-9 greater than 37 U/ml, CEA levels greater than 5 mu g/ml, larger tumor size, positive lymph nodes, moderate with poor tumor differentiation, peripancreas fat invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy were all associated with OS. LRAMPS nearly improved OS but did not reach statistical significance. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels greater than 5 ug/ml (HR 1.693; 95% CI 1.200-1.132; P = 0.001), and positive lymph nodes (HR 2.410; 95% CI 1.453-3.995; P = 0.001) were independently associated with poor OS. Treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.491; 95% CI 0.248-0.708; P = 0.001). Conclusions: The LRAMPS procedure achieved comparable results to standard LDPS in terms of postoperative outcomes. Treatment with chemotherapy is important for the prognosis of patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Survival after Margin-Positive Resection in the Era of Modern Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Do Patients Still Benefit?
    Arrington, Amanda K.
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    Schaefer, Kenzie L.
    O'Grady, Catherine L.
    Khreiss, Mohammad
    Riall, Taylor S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [2] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
    Bassi, Claudio
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Dervenis, Christos
    Sarr, Micheal
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Adham, Mustapha
    Allen, Peter
    Andersson, Roland
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Falconi, Massimo
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Izbicki, Jakob
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Olah, Attila
    Schulick, Richard
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vollmer, Charles
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Salvia, Roberto
    Buehler, Marcus
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [3] Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer
    Chun, Yun Shin
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [4] The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience
    Clavien, Pierre A.
    Barkun, Jeffrey
    de Oliveira, Michelle L.
    Vauthey, Jean Nicolas
    Dindo, Daniel
    Schulick, Richard D.
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Pekolj, Juan
    Slankamenac, Ksenija
    Bassi, Claudio
    Graf, Rolf
    Vonlanthen, Rene
    Padbury, Robert
    Cameron, John L.
    Makuuchi, Masatoshi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) : 187 - 196
  • [5] Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Dai, Menghua
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Li, Yatong
    Xing, Cheng
    Ding, Cheng
    Liao, Quan
    Zhang, Taiping
    Guo, Junchao
    Xu, Qiang
    Han, Xianlin
    Liu, Wenjing
    Liu, Qiaofei
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (07) : 1126 - 1134
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD) A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    de Rooij, Thijs
    van Hilst, Jony
    van Santvoort, Hjalmar
    Boerma, Djamila
    van den Boezem, Peter
    Daams, Freek
    van Dam, Ronald
    Dejong, Cees
    van Duyn, Eino
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel
    van Eijck, Casper
    Festen, Sebastiaan
    Gerhards, Michael
    Koerkamp, Bas Groot
    de Hingh, Ignace
    Kazemier, Geert
    Klaase, Joost
    de Kleine, Ruben
    van Laarhoven, Cornelis
    Luyer, Misha
    Patijn, Gijs
    Steenvoorde, Pascal
    Suker, Mustafa
    Abu Hilal, Moh'd
    Busch, Olivier
    Besselink, Marc
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [7] Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Hirashita, Teijiro
    Iwashita, Yukio
    Fujinaga, Atsuro
    Nakanuma, Hiroaki
    Tada, Kazuhiro
    Masuda, Takashi
    Endo, Yuichi
    Ohta, Masayuki
    Inomata, Masafumi
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2022, 52 (02) : 224 - 230
  • [8] Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: findings of a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score matching study
    Kim, Hyung Sun
    Hong, Tae Ho
    You, Young-Kyoung
    Park, Joon Seong
    Yoon, Dong Sup
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (11) : 1775 - 1786
  • [9] A systematic scoping review of the initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic malignancy
    Larkins, Kirsten
    Rowcroft, Alistair
    Pandanaboyana, Sanjay
    Loveday, Benjamin P. T.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (09): : 4930 - 4944
  • [10] Comparison of perioperative short-term outcomes and oncologic long-term outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Lee, Jung Min
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kang, Jae Seung
    Byun, Yoonhyeong
    Choi, Yoo Jin
    Sohn, Hee Ju
    Han, Youngmin
    Kwon, Wooil
    Jang, Jin-Young
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 100 (06) : 320 - 328