Promoting relationship learning

被引:610
作者
Selnes, F [1 ]
Sallis, J
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch Management BI, Oslo, Norway
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.67.3.80.18656
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors develop a theory of how management can develop and promote the learning capabilities of targeted customer-supplier relationships. The theory suggests that a supplier and a customer can improve their joint learning activities by facilitating information exchange, developing common learning arenas, and updating their behavior accordingly. The authors suggest that learning within a customer-supplier relationship cannot be mandated by either organization, but rather learning depends on both parties' willingness to cooperate in joint learning activities. Management can promote relationship learning by cultivating a collaborative culture, formulating specific objectives for joint learning activities, and developing relational trust. However, as relational trust develops, the effectiveness of learning is reduced as a result of "hidden costs" of trust. The authors use data from 315 dyads to test the theory empirically, and they find that the learning capability of a relationship has a strong, positive effect on performance. Their results also provide insight into how to address the hidden costs of trust.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 95
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
ALELROD R, 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[2]   THE USE OF PLEDGES TO BUILD AND SUSTAIN COMMITMENT IN DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS [J].
ANDERSON, E ;
WEITZ, B .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (01) :18-34
[3]   A MODEL OF DISTRIBUTOR FIRM AND MANUFACTURER FIRM WORKING PARTNERSHIPS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
NARUS, JA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :42-58
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT BUSINESS REV
[6]   The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance [J].
Baker, WE ;
Sinkula, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 27 (04) :411-427
[7]  
Biong H., 1996, J BUSINESS TO BUSINE, V3, P39
[8]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[9]   TESTS FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS - INTRODUCTION [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
LONG, JS .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :123-131
[10]   HYBRID ARRANGEMENTS AS STRATEGIC ALLIANCES - THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ORGANIZATIONAL COMBINATIONS [J].
BORYS, B ;
JEMISON, DB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (02) :234-249