Evaluating Advisors: A Policy-Capturing Study Under Conditions of Complete and Missing Information

被引:51
作者
Bonaccio, Silvia [1 ]
Dalal, Reeshad S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Telfer Sch Management, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
关键词
decision-making; advice taking; advisor; policy-capturing; missing information; trust; GENERALIZED SELF-EFFICACY; DECISION-MAKING; IMPROVING JUDGMENT; ADVICE; CONFIDENCE; AGGREGATION; PERFORMANCE; AMBIGUITY; SELECTION; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.649
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Decision-makers' relative preferences for various advisor characteristics were investigated in two multilevel policy-capturing studies. The characteristics under consideration were: advisor expertise, advisor confidence, advisor intentions, and whether that advisor was the sole available source of advice. In Study 1, decision-makers had access to all relevant information about the advisors. In contrast, some relevant information about the advisors was systematically made unavailable in Study 2, which allowed an investigation of the effect of missing information on decision-makers' evaluations of advisors. Results from both studies indicated that advisor expertise and intentions were most important in promoting decision-makers' positive evaluations of advisors, that this effect was even more pronounced under conditions of missing information, and that advisor expertise and intentions also interacted synergistically. Given that expertise and good intentions are determinants of an advisor's trustworthiness, the results highlight the interpersonal nature of advice giving and taking. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 249
页数:23
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques [J].
Aiman-Smith, L ;
Scullen, SE ;
Barr, SH .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2002, 5 (04) :388-414
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, J. Behav. Decis. Mak., DOI [DOI 10.1002/BDM.3960010303, 10.1002/bdm.3960010303]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The adaptive decision-maker, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173933
[4]   The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression [J].
Azen, R ;
Budescu, DV .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (02) :129-148
[5]   MEASURES OF COMPENSATORY AND NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS OF DECISION BEHAVIOR - PROCESS TRACING VERSUS POLICY CAPTURING [J].
BILLINGS, RS ;
MARCUS, SA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1983, 31 (03) :331-352
[6]   Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences [J].
Bonaccio, Silvia ;
Dalal, Reeshad S. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2006, 101 (02) :127-151
[7]  
Budescu D.V., 2006, DECIS ANAL, V3, P145
[8]   Aggregation of opinions based on correlated cues and advisors [J].
Budescu, David V. ;
Yu, Hsiu-Ting .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 20 (02) :153-177
[9]   The effects of asymmetry among advisors on the aggregation of their opinions [J].
Budescu, DV ;
Rantilla, AK ;
Yu, HT ;
Karelitz, TM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 90 (01) :178-194
[10]   Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions [J].
Budescu, DV ;
Rantilla, AK .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2000, 104 (03) :371-398