Firm value creation and levels of strategy

被引:34
作者
Bowman, Cliff [1 ]
Ambrosini, Veronique [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Univ, Cranfield Sch Management, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
关键词
competitive strategy; corporate strategy; market value; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; LOOSELY COUPLED SYSTEMS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; CORPORATE-STRATEGY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/00251740710745007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The paper aims to address the following questions: "How is value created within a firm?" and "Is the distinction between competitive and corporate strategy helpful in considering the processes of value creation?" Design/methodology/approach - The paper distinguishes five value-creating activities within the firm. Three are involved in the process of current value creation, one is directed at the maintenance of the firm and the other activity is concerned with the creation of future value. These processes of value creation are then explored from the perspective of corporate and business levels of strategy by considering whether these activities can be tightly or loosely coupled. Findings - The paper argues that decisions regarding loosely or tightly coupled value-creating activities should belong to the realm of corporate strategy and that this "corporatising" choice involves trade-offs in terms of responsiveness and cost. Practical implications - The arguments in this paper can be used by managers to help them think through the consequences of any corporate level strategy decisions they may envisage taking. Originality/value - This paper addresses traditional strategic management questions by building on a range of literatures, and proposes an original and meaningful way of examining the role of corporate and competitive strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 371
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Argyris C., 1990, OVERCOMING ORG DEFEN
[2]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[3]  
Barney J., 2006, Strategic Management and Competitve Advantage
[4]  
Barney J. B., 1986, Management Science, V32, P1231, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231
[5]   Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes [J].
Barney, JB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01) :41-56
[6]   Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy [J].
Bowman, C ;
Ambrosini, V .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 11 (01) :1-15
[7]  
Burns T., 1966, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO
[8]   A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE [J].
CLARKSON, MBE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) :92-117
[9]   When competitive advantage doesn't lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power [J].
Coff, RW .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (02) :119-133
[10]  
Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1105, DOI 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO