Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study

被引:0
作者
Hayashi, Tatsuya [1 ]
Yano, Shimpei [2 ]
Shibukawa, Shuhei [3 ,4 ]
Kojima, Shinya [1 ]
Ito, Toshimune [1 ]
Oba, Hiroshi [5 ]
Kondo, Hiroshi [5 ]
Yamamoto, Asako [5 ]
Okamoto, Takahide [1 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Grad Sch Med Technol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Teikyo Univ Hosp, Cent Radiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Juntendo Univ, Dept Radiol Technol, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Art & Sci, Ctr Evolutionary Cognit Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Teikyo Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Bone marrow fat; chemical shift; DIXON; proton density fat fraction (PDFF); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; WATER; MRI; T-1; QUANTIFICATION; T-2-ASTERISK; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.21037/qims-22-396
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Arm positions employed during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can affect magnetic field distribution, which may result in variability in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements. This study evaluated the effect of arm position on lumbar PDFF measured using chemical-shift- encoded MRI (CSE-MRI). Fifteen healthy volunteers from a single-center underwent lumbar CSE-MRI at two different arm positions ( side and elevated) using a single 3T scanner. Scans were performed twice in each position. PDFFs of the L1-L5 vertebrae were independently measured by two readers, and reader measurements were compared by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We compared PDFF measurements from two arm positions and from two consecutive scans using the Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis. Measurements from the two readers were in high agreement [ICC =0.999; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.998-0.999]. No significant difference was observed between PDFFs from the first and second scans of all vertebrae for each reader (all P>0.05); however, PDFF for the elevated arm position was significantly higher than that for the side arm position (37.9-44.8% vs. 37.0-43.8%; all P<0.05), except at the L2 level by reader 2. The mean differences in PDFF measurements from the first and second scans [0.1%; 95% limits of agreement (LoA), -1.8% to 1.9%] and from the side arm and elevated arm positions (0.8%; 95% LoA, -1.6% to 3.2%) were small. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that different arm positions during CSE-MRI can slightly affect lumbar PDFF; however, the mean absolute differences were very small.
引用
收藏
页码:5263 / 5270
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Abramoff M. D., 2004, Biophotonics Int., V11, P36
  • [2] Assessment of Whole Spine Vertebral Bone Marrow Fat Using Chemical Shift-Encoding Based Water-Fat MRI
    Baum, Thomas
    Yap, Samuel P.
    Dieckmeyer, Michael
    Ruschke, Stefan
    Eggers, Holger
    Kooijman, Hendrik
    Rummeny, Ernst J.
    Bauer, Jan S.
    Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) : 1018 - 1023
  • [3] Evaluation of dual-source parallel RF excitation technology in MRI of thoraco-lumbar spine at 3.0T
    Bouvier, J.
    Tropres, I.
    Lamalle, L.
    Grand, S.
    Breil, S.
    Le Bas, J. -F.
    Krainik, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2013, 40 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [4] Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi-slice imaging
    Breuer, FA
    Blaimer, M
    Heidemann, RM
    Mueller, MF
    Griswold, MA
    Jakob, PM
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (03) : 684 - 691
  • [5] MR-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of the vertebral bone marrow differentiates between patients with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures
    Gassert, F. T.
    Kufner, A.
    Gassert, F. G.
    Leonhardt, Y.
    Kronthaler, S.
    Schwaiger, B. J.
    Boehm, C.
    Makowski, M. R.
    Kirschke, J. S.
    Baum, T.
    Karampinos, D. C.
    Gersing, A. S.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 33 (02) : 487 - 496
  • [6] T1 Independent, T2* Corrected MRI With Accurate Spectral Modeling for Quantification of Fat: Validation in a Fat-Water-SPIO Phantom
    Hines, Catherine D. G.
    Yu, Huanzhou
    Shimakawa, Ann
    McKenzie, Charles A.
    Brittain, Jean H.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (05) : 1215 - 1222
  • [7] Linearity and Bias of Proton Density Fat Fraction as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker: A Multicenter, Multiplatform, Multivendor Phantom Study
    Hu, Houchun H.
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Hernando, Diego
    Malyarenko, Dariya
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    Smith, Mark A.
    Serai, Suraj D.
    Middleton, Michael S.
    Henderson, Walter C.
    Hamilton, Gavin
    Shaffer, Jean
    Shu, Yunhong
    Tkach, Jean A.
    Trout, Andrew T.
    Obuchowski, Nancy
    Brittain, Jean H.
    Jackson, Edward F.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 640 - 651
  • [8] Simple modification of arm position improves B1+ and signal homogeneity in the thoracolumbar spine at 3T
    Ishizaka, Kinya
    Kudo, Kohsuke
    Harada, Kuniaki
    Shirai, Toru
    Fujiwara, Taro
    Aoike, Suzuko
    Takamori, Sayaka
    Shirato, Hiroki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (01) : 123 - 130
  • [9] Quantitative MRI and Spectroscopy of Bone Marrow
    Karampinos, Dimitrios C.
    Ruschke, Stefan
    Dieckmeyer, Michael
    Diefenbach, Maximilian
    Franz, Daniela
    Gersing, Alexandra S.
    Krug, Roland
    Baum, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (02) : 332 - 353
  • [10] Accuracy and precision of proton density fat fraction measurement across field strengths and scan intervals: A phantom and human study
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Cho, Hyo Jung
    Kim, Bohyun
    You, Myung-Won
    Lee, Jei Hee
    Huh, Jimi
    Kim, Jai Keun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (01) : 305 - 314