Considerations and Methods for Usability Testing with Children

被引:1
|
作者
Andersen, Malene Hjortboe [1 ]
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin [1 ]
Brooks, Eva Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept & Learning & Philosophy, Fac Humanities, Kroghstr 3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
来源
INTERACTIVITY, GAME CREATION, DESIGN, LEARNING, AND INNOVATION | 2018年 / 196卷
关键词
Child-computer interaction; Usability testing; Usability evaluation; Usability testing methods;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, the authors draw on methods used in the field of interaction design, emphasizing a user-centred design approach including methods such as usability testing, design metaphors, interview with users, video observations, focus groups, and think aloud sessions. However, a challenge of these methods is that they are designed for adults and are not necessarily appropriate to investigations including children. The guiding questions for this systematic literature review are (1) the motivation for conducting usability tests with children, and (2) the kind of methodological, practical, and ethical considerations that should be considered when involving children in usability studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and PRISMA flow diagram are applied in order to assure the quality of the process of this investigation. Nine articles are analyzed and then synthesized by applying the constant comparative method. The synthesis of the literature review is based on the identified thematic priorities, which are categorized as follows: (1) the motivation for involving children as test persons in design processes, (2) definitions of usability, (3) practical considerations, (4) methodological considerations, and (5) ethical considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Usability Testing, Interface Design, and Portals
    Ward, Jennifer L.
    Hiller, Steve
    JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 43 (1-2) : 155 - 171
  • [42] Pattern-Based Usability Testing
    Dias, Fernando
    Paiva, Ana C. R.
    10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TESTING, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION WORKSHOPS - ICSTW 2017, 2017, : 366 - 371
  • [43] Component-specific usability testing
    Brinkman, Willem-Paul
    Haakma, Reinder
    Bouwhuis, Don G.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2008, 38 (05): : 1143 - 1155
  • [44] Defining Expected Behavior for Usability Testing
    Propp, Stefan
    Forbrig, Peter
    HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5619 : 110 - 119
  • [45] Visualizing Usability Testing Video Data
    Cho, S.
    Frost, A.
    Providenti, M.
    Reichler, D.
    SIGDOC'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION, 2017,
  • [46] Usability testing of a fall prevention toolkit
    Keuter, Kayla R.
    Berg, Gina M.
    Hervey, Ashley M.
    Rogers, Nicole
    JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS, 2015, 28 (05): : 46 - 52
  • [47] Field usability testing: Method, not compromise
    Rosenbaum, Stephanie
    Kantner, Laurie
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE, 2007, : 154 - 160
  • [48] Usability Testing: A Software Engineering Perspective
    Bandi, Ajay
    Heeler, Phil
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTIONS (ICHCI), 2013,
  • [49] Opinion Mining on Usability Testing Data
    Tekin, Cetin
    Yuksek, Hakan
    Aktas, Mehmet S.
    Arslan, Burak
    Sahin, Yunus
    2020 28TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2020,
  • [50] THE USABILITY TESTING OF AN EDUCATIONAL APP GAME
    Lin, C. L.
    Liu, Y. C.
    INTED2015: 9TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2015, : 3483 - 3491