Considerations and Methods for Usability Testing with Children

被引:1
|
作者
Andersen, Malene Hjortboe [1 ]
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin [1 ]
Brooks, Eva Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept & Learning & Philosophy, Fac Humanities, Kroghstr 3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
来源
INTERACTIVITY, GAME CREATION, DESIGN, LEARNING, AND INNOVATION | 2018年 / 196卷
关键词
Child-computer interaction; Usability testing; Usability evaluation; Usability testing methods;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, the authors draw on methods used in the field of interaction design, emphasizing a user-centred design approach including methods such as usability testing, design metaphors, interview with users, video observations, focus groups, and think aloud sessions. However, a challenge of these methods is that they are designed for adults and are not necessarily appropriate to investigations including children. The guiding questions for this systematic literature review are (1) the motivation for conducting usability tests with children, and (2) the kind of methodological, practical, and ethical considerations that should be considered when involving children in usability studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and PRISMA flow diagram are applied in order to assure the quality of the process of this investigation. Nine articles are analyzed and then synthesized by applying the constant comparative method. The synthesis of the literature review is based on the identified thematic priorities, which are categorized as follows: (1) the motivation for involving children as test persons in design processes, (2) definitions of usability, (3) practical considerations, (4) methodological considerations, and (5) ethical considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Procuring Usability: Experiences of Usability Testing in Tender Evaluation
    Riihiaho, Sirpa
    Nieminen, Marko
    Westman, Stina
    Addams-Moring, Ronja
    Katainen, Jukka
    NORDIC CONTRIBUTIONS IN IS RESEARCH (SCIS 2015), 2015, 223 : 108 - 120
  • [22] Methods for measuring usability
    Bevan, N
    Curson, I
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT '97, 1997, : 672 - 673
  • [23] Usability Testing of a Bystander Bullying Intervention for Rural Middle Schools: Mixed Methods Study
    Midgett, Aida
    Doumas, Diana M.
    Peralta, Claudia
    Peck, Matt
    Reilly, Blaine
    Buller, K.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2025, 12
  • [24] Remote Web usability testing
    Baravalle, A
    Lanfranchi, V
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 2003, 35 (03): : 364 - 368
  • [25] Usability testing for blind users
    Ribera, Mireia
    Termens, Miquel
    Martin, Maika Garcia
    PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2008, 17 (01): : 99 - 105
  • [26] Remote Usability Testing: A Practice
    Huang, Sheng-Cheng
    Bias, Randolph G.
    Payne, Tanya L.
    Rogers, Jay B.
    JCDL 09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 ACM/IEEE JOINT CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL LIBRARIES, 2009, : 397 - 397
  • [27] Usability Testing - An Aphasia Perspective
    Roper, Abi
    Davey, Ian
    Wilson, Stephanie
    Neate, Timothy
    Marshall, Jane
    Grellmann, Brian
    ASSETS'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2018, : 102 - 106
  • [28] USABILITY TESTING OF LANGUAGE WEBSITES
    Cerna, M.
    Svobodova, L.
    ICERI2015: 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2015, : 2190 - 2198
  • [29] Context Mediated Usability Testing
    Kuziemsky, Craig E.
    Kushniruk, Andre
    E-HEALTH - FOR CONTINUITY OF CARE, 2014, 205 : 905 - 909
  • [30] Remote Web usability testing
    Andres Baravalle
    Vitaveska Lanfranchi
    Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2003, 35 : 364 - 368