Practice Changes at US Transplant Centers After the New Adult Heart Allocation Policy

被引:95
作者
Parker, William F. [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Kevin [3 ]
Anderson, Allen S. [4 ]
Siegler, Mark [2 ]
Huang, Elbert S. [1 ,2 ]
Churpek, Matthew M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.066
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In October 2018, the U.S. heart allocation system expanded the number of priority "status" tiers from 3 to 6 and added cardiogenic shock requirements for some heart transplant candidates listed with specific types of treatments. OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine the impact of the new policy on the treatment practices of transplant centers. METHODS Initial listing data on all adult heart candidates listed from December 1, 2017 to April 30, 2019 were collected from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The status-qualifying treatments (or exception requests) and hemodynamic values at listing of a post-policy cohort (December 2018 to April 2019) were compared with a seasonally matched pre-policy cohort (December 2017 to April 2018). Candidates in the pre-policy cohort were reclassified into the new priority system statuses by using treatment, diagnosis, and hemodynamics. RESULTS Comparing the post-policy cohort (N = 1,567) with the pre-policy cohort (N = 1,606), there were significant increases in listings with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (+1.2%), intra-aortic balloon pumps (+ 4 %), and exceptions (+12%). Listings with low-dose inotropes (-18%) and high-dose inotropes (-3%) significantly decreased. The new priority status distribution had more status 2 (+14%) candidates than expected and fewer status 3 (-5%), status 4 (-4%) and status 6 (-8%) candidates than expected (p values <0.01 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS After implementation of the new heart allocation policy, transplant centers listed more candidates with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, intra-aortic balloon pumps, and exception requests and fewer candidates with inotrope therapy than expected, thus leading to significantly more high-priority status listings than anticipated. If these early trends persist, the new allocation system may not function as intended. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2906-16) (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:2906 / 2916
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) :3661-3679
[2]  
Benjamin EJ, 2018, CIRCULATION, V137, pE67, DOI [10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485, 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000530]
[3]  
Colvin M, 2019, Am J Transplant, V19 Suppl 2, P323, DOI 10.1111/ajt.15278
[4]   OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Heart [J].
Colvin, M. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Hadley, N. ;
Skeans, M. A. ;
Carrico, R. ;
Uccellini, K. ;
Lehman, R. ;
Robinson, A. ;
Israni, A. K. ;
Snyder, J. J. ;
Kasiske, B. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 :291-362
[5]   Transplant Registrants With Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Devices Have Insufficient Risk to Justify Elective Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Status 1A Time [J].
Dardas, Todd ;
Mokadam, Nahush A. ;
Pagani, Francis ;
Aaronson, Keith ;
Levy, Wayne C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (01) :36-43
[6]   The Blurred Line Between Gaming and Patient Advocacy Heart Transplant Listing Decisions in the Modern Era [J].
Khazanie, Prateeti ;
Drazner, Mark H. .
CIRCULATION, 2019, 140 (25) :2048-2050
[7]   Effects of the 2006 US thoracic organ allocation change: Analysis of local impact on organ procurement and heart transplantation [J].
Nativi, Jose N. ;
Kfoury, Abdallah G. ;
Myrick, Craig ;
Peters, Melissa ;
Renlund, Dale ;
Gilbert, Edward M. ;
Bader, Feras ;
Singhal, Arun K. ;
Everitt, Melanie ;
Fisher, Patrick ;
Bull, David A. ;
Selzman, Craig ;
Stehlik, Josef .
JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (03) :235-239
[8]  
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, OPTN POL 6 ALL HEART
[9]  
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, 2016, Modify Adult Heart Allocation 2016 2nd Round
[10]  
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee, PROP MOD AD HEART AL