共 26 条
Predictors of Treatment Success After Periprosthetic Joint Infection: 24-Month Follow up From a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study of 653 Patients
被引:29
作者:
Davis, Joshua S.
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Metcalf, Sarah
[5
]
Clark, Benjamin
[6
]
Robinson, J. Owen
[7
,8
]
Huggan, Paul
[9
]
Luey, Chris
[10
]
McBride, Stephen
[11
]
Aboltins, Craig
[11
,12
]
Nelson, Renjy
[13
]
Campbell, David
[14
,15
]
Solomon, L. Bogdan
[15
,16
]
Schneider, Kellie
[17
]
Loewenthal, Mark R.
[3
,4
]
Yates, Piers
[17
,18
]
Athan, Eugene
[19
]
Cooper, Darcie
[20
]
Rad, Babak
[19
]
Allworth, Tony
[21
]
Reid, Alistair
[22
]
Read, Kerry
[23
]
Leung, Peter
[24
]
Sud, Archana
[25
]
Nagendra, Vana
[26
]
Chean, Roy
[27
]
Lemoh, Chris
[28
]
Mutalima, Nora
[29
]
Tran, Ton
[29
]
Grimwade, Kate
[30
]
Sehu, Marjoree
[31
]
Looke, David
[31
]
Torda, Adrienne
[32
]
Aung, Thi
[33
]
Graves, Steven
[34
,35
]
Paterson, David L.
[36
]
Manning, Laurens
[6
,18
]
机构:
[1] Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Rocklands Dr, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia
[2] Charles Darwin Univ, Darwin, NT, Australia
[3] John Hunter Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[5] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Christchurch, New Zealand
[6] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[7] Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Perth, WA, Australia
[8] Murdoch Univ, Coll Sci Hlth Engn & Educ, Discipline Hlth, Perth, WA, Australia
[9] Waikato Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Hamilton, New Zealand
[10] Counties Manukau Dist Hlth Board, Auckland, New Zealand
[11] Northern Hlth, Dept Infect Dis, Melbourne, NSW, Australia
[12] Univ Melbourne, Northern Clin Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[13] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[14] Wakefield Orthopaed Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[15] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[16] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[17] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[18] Univ Western Australia, Med Sch, Perth, WA, Australia
[19] Deakin Univ, Dept Infect Dis, Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[20] Deakin Univ, Geelong Ctr Emerging Infect Dis, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[21] St Vincents Private Hosp Northside, Dept Infect Dis, Chermside, Qld, Australia
[22] Wollongong Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[23] North Shore Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Auckland, New Zealand
[24] Royal Hobart Hosp, Dept Microbiol & Infect Dis, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[25] Nepean Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
[26] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[27] Latrobe Reg Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Traralgon, Vic, Australia
[28] Dandenong Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Dandenong, Vic, Australia
[29] Dandenong Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dandenong, Vic, Australia
[30] Tauranga Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Tauranga, New Zealand
[31] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Infect Management Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[32] UNSW Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Randwick, NSW, Australia
[33] Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Redcliffe, Qld, Australia
[34] Australian Orthopaed Assoc Natl Joint Replacement, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[35] Univ South Australia, Sch Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[36] Univ Queensland, UQ Ctr Clin Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源:
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES
|
2022年
/
9卷
/
03期
关键词:
arthroplasty;
debridement;
infectious arthritis;
mantente sintiendote libre;
IMPLANT RETENTION;
DAIR DEBRIDEMENT;
ANTIBIOTICS;
MANAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1093/ofid/ofac048
中图分类号:
R392 [医学免疫学];
Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号:
100102 ;
摘要:
This large observational study of prosthetic joint infection suggests that debridement and implant retention should be reserved for early postimplant infections and that matching a patient to the appropriate management strategy is the key role of treating clinicians. Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating condition and there is a lack of evidence to guide its management. We hypothesized that treatment success is independently associated with modifiable variables in surgical and antibiotic management. Methods The is a prospective, observational study at 27 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Newly diagnosed large joint PJIs were eligible. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. The main outcome measures at 24 months were clinical cure (defined as all of the following: alive, absence of clinical or microbiological evidence of infection, and not requiring ongoing antibiotic therapy) and treatment success (clinical cure plus index prosthesis still in place). Results Twenty-four-month outcome data were available for 653 patients. Overall, 449 patients (69%) experienced clinical cure and 350 (54%) had treatment success. The most common treatment strategy was debridement and implant retention (DAIR), with success rates highest in early postimplant infections (119 of 160, 74%) and lower in late acute (132 of 267, 49%) and chronic (63 of 142, 44%) infections. Selected comorbidities, knee joint, and Staphylococcus aureus infections were independently associated with treatment failure, but antibiotic choice and duration (including rifampicin use) and extent of debridement were not. Conclusions Treatment success in PJI is associated with (1) selecting the appropriate treatment strategy and (2) nonmodifiable patient and infection factors. Interdisciplinary decision making that matches an individual patient to an appropriate management strategy is a critical step for PJI management. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the role of rifampicin in patients managed with DAIR and the optimal surgical strategy for late-acute PJI.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文