Tear osmolarity measurement using the TearLab™ Osmolarity System in the assessment of dry eye treatment effectiveness

被引:121
作者
Benelli, Umberto [1 ]
Nardi, Marco [1 ]
Posarelli, Chiara [1 ]
Albert, Timothy G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Neurosci, Sect Ophthalmol, I-56126 Pisa, Pi, Italy
关键词
Lubricant eye drop; Tear osmolarity; Dry eye; ARTIFICIAL TEARS; INSTILLATION; FORMULATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clae.2010.01.003
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of three commercially available lubricant eye drops for the treatment of mild, dry, irritated eyes. Methods: Randomized, investigator-masked evaluation of 60 patients in which 20 patients used carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC), 0.5% (Cellufresh (R), Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) (group 1); 20 patients used a drop containing polyethylene glycol 400, 2.5% and sodium hyaluronate (Blink (R) Tears, Abbott Medical Optics Inc., Santa Ana, CA) (group 2); and 20 patients used HP Guar 0.18% (Systane (R), Alcon Laboratories Inc., Ft. Worth, TX) (group 3). Study visits were at baseline and 1 month. Tests performed at both visits included Schirmer, tear-film break-up time (TBUT), visual acuity, fluorescein staining, tear osmolarity and wavefront aberrometry. Osmolarity testing was performed prior to instillation of the lubricant eye drops and then a final time 5 min after instillation of the drop at both day 1 and day 30. Tear osmolarity was performed only in the right eye and only one time before and after instillation of lubricant eye drops. Results: At day 1 the mean reduction in osmolarity 5 min after instillation of the lubricant eye drop was, -5.0 +/- 1.9 in group 1, -9.0 +/- 4.2 in group 2 and -5.0 +/- 2.2 in group 3. At day 30 the mean reduction in osmolarity 5 min after instillation of the lubricant eye drop was, -5.6 +/- 2.3 mOsm/L in group 1; -9.9 +/- 2.8 mOsm/L in group 2 and -4.5 +/- 1.8 mOsm/L in group 3. The differences were statistically significant between groups 1 and 2, and 2 and 3. There was a reduction of osmolarity from day 1 to day 30 but the differences were not statistically significant. We feel that after a 30-day treatment with the lubricant eye drops, the lower osmolarity values could indicate that the tear film is progressing towards a more normal osmolarity value. A future study could examine the tear osmolarity value after 60 or 90 days of usage. LogMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) results showed an improvement in group 2 compared with baseline with no change in BCVA in groups 1 and 3. There was no statistically significant change from day 1 to 1 month in TBUT, while the Schirmer test showed an improvement in all groups at 1 month. Conclusions: Assessment of tear osmolarity provides the most objective, measurable test for determining improvement in dry eye patients. The instillation of any artificial tear or lubricant eye drop should decrease the tear-film osmolarity. The results found that polyethylene glycol 400,0.25% and sodium hyaluronate (Blink (R) Intensive Tears) significantly improved tear osmolarity compared with carboxymethylcellulose sodium (CMC), 0.5% (Cellufresh (R)) and HP Guar 0.18% (Systane (R)) after instillation. (C) 2010 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Dysfunctional tear syndrome - A Delphi approach to treatment recommendations
    Behrens, Ashley
    Doyle, John J.
    Stern, Lee
    Chuck, Roy S.
    McDonnell, Peter J.
    Azar, Dimitri T.
    Dua, Harminder S.
    Hom, Milton
    Karpecki, Paul M.
    Laibson, Peter R.
    Lemp, Michael A.
    Meisler, David M.
    Murube del Castillo, Juan
    O'Brien, Terrence P.
    Pflugfelder, Stephen C.
    Rolando, Maurizio
    Schein, Oliver D.
    Seitz, Berthold
    Tseng, Scheffer C.
    van Setten, Gysbert
    Wilson, Steven E.
    Yiu, Samuel C.
    [J]. CORNEA, 2006, 25 (08) : 900 - 907
  • [2] Comparison of two artificial tear formulations using aberrometry
    Berger, Jeffrey S.
    Head, Kyle R.
    Salmon, Thomas O.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2009, 92 (03) : 206 - 211
  • [3] Efficacy of different dry eye treatments with artificial tears or ocular lubricants: a systematic review
    Doughty, Michael J.
    Glavin, Sara
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2009, 29 (06) : 573 - 583
  • [4] DEWS report: A mission completed
    Foulks, Gary N.
    [J]. OCULAR SURFACE, 2007, 5 (02) : 65 - 66
  • [5] Comparative studies of various hyaluronic acids produced by microbial fermentation for potential topical ophthalmic applications
    Guillaumie, Fanny
    Furrer, Pascal
    Felt-Baeyens, Olivia
    Fuhlendorff, Birgit L.
    Nymand, Soren
    Westh, Peter
    Gurny, Robert
    Schwach-Abdellaoui, Khadija
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2010, 92A (04) : 1421 - 1430
  • [6] The Association Between Symptoms of Discomfort and Signs in Dry Eye
    Johnson, Michael E.
    [J]. OCULAR SURFACE, 2009, 7 (04) : 199 - 211
  • [7] Carbomer and sodium hyaluronate eyedrops for moderate dry eye treatment
    Johnson, Michael Edward
    Murphy, Paul James
    Boulton, Mike
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (08) : 750 - 757
  • [8] Effect of artificial tears on tear stress test
    Khanal, Santosh
    Simmons, Peter A.
    Pearce, Edward I.
    Day, Mhairi
    Tomlinson, Alan
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2008, 85 (08) : 732 - 739
  • [9] Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease
    Lemp, Michael A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 146 (03) : 350 - 356
  • [10] A Link between Tear Instability and Hyperosmolarity in Dry Eye
    Liu, Haixia
    Begley, Carolyn
    Chen, Minhua
    Bradley, Arthur
    Bonanno, Joseph
    McNamara, Nancy A.
    Nelson, J. Daniel
    Simpson, Trefford
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (08) : 3671 - 3679