How can we make a socially optimal large-scale media platform? Analysis of a monopolistic Internet media platform using two-sided market theory

被引:20
作者
Kim, Song-min [1 ]
机构
[1] Elect & Telecommun Res Inst, Ind Strategy Res Dept, 218 Gajeong Ro, Daejeon 305700, South Korea
关键词
Media platform; Two-sided market; Technology; Advertising; Prosumer; COMPETITION; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.telpol.2016.07.001
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Monopolistic media platforms (MMPs) are increasingly prominent in the global Internet media industry due to the lock-in effect of the network economy. A MMP is capable of offering great utilities to its users and content providers (CPs) because such parties do not need to access multiple Internet media platforms to find their trading partners. However, a MMP operator (MMPO) can have a significant negative impact upon social welfare whenever it attempts to maximize profits via abuses of its own monopolistic power. The aims of this paper are as follows: firstly, we construct a model of a monopolistic media platform market to identify and analyze the decisions of a MMPO based on two-sided market theory. Secondly, we demonstrate how three factors - matching technology, prosumer strategy and advertising technology - impact on the size of the network and social welfare. Finally, we provide both policy makers and media platform operators (MPOs) with useful suggestions on how to promote the Internet media industry and deter MMPOs from abusing their own powers. From the analysis of the modified new model we suggest, matching technology and prosumer policy are demonstrated to increase the number of users and CPs of the platform and increase social welfare. Advertising policy is also one way of increasing social welfare, however, the necessity of monitoring of government for MMPO is proven because it may harm the utility of users. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 918
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ABI research, 2013, TOP OTT MULT VID SER
[2]  
[Anonymous], HORIZONTAL MERGER GU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OECD COMM OUTL 2013
[4]  
[Anonymous], SPECIAL PUBLICATION
[5]  
Apple, 2013, APPL 2013 ANN REP
[6]   Competition in two-sided markets [J].
Armstrong, Mark .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) :668-691
[7]  
ATSC, 2014, ATSC 3 0 WE STAND
[8]  
Banard J., 2015, GOOGLE STRENGTHENS I
[9]  
Boudreau K.J., 2009, WORKING PAPER
[10]   Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers [J].
Caillaud, B ;
Jullien, B .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 34 (02) :309-328