Laparoscopic assisted dismembered pyeloplasty in children: intermediate results

被引:8
作者
Sukumar, Sudhir [1 ]
Nair, Balagopal [1 ]
Sanjeevan, K. V. [1 ]
Mathew, Georgie [1 ]
Bhat, H. Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Amrita Inst Med Sci & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Kochi, Kerala, India
关键词
laparoscopy; pediatrics; urologic surgical procedures; ureteral obstruction;
D O I
10.1007/s00383-008-2109-9
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
To study the results of an innovative minimally invasive technique of performing dismembered pyeloplasty in children. Using 5 mm camera and 3 mm working ports, the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) is mobilized by a transperitoneal laparoscopic technique. The UPJ is brought out through a tiny flank incision and a standard dismembered pyeloplasty is performed over a double J stent. Between October 2003 and January 2005, 13 children underwent laparoscopic assisted dismembered pyeloplasty. Indications, operative duration, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative isotope renogram parameters were analyzed. The children were in the age range of 3 months to 6 years-three were right sided and ten were left sided. Only three were symptomatic while the remaining ten were detected to have UPJ obstruction during evaluation for antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Mean operative duration was 104.2 min (range 80-150 min) with no significant difference in the two patients with crossing vessels. Incision was smaller than 2 cms in all and the average postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2-5 days). Follow-up ranging from 28 to 44 months showed reduction in hydronephrosis and improvement in renal function of all the operated units. Isotope renogram in only one patient showed equivocal slopes and prolonged half clearance times though no further surgical intervention was required. This technique has results comparable to that of open pyeloplasty and hence, maybe considered a good option for surgeons making the transition to laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 406
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Pelviureteric obstruction in children: Conventional pyeloplasty is superior to endo-urology [J].
Ahmed, S ;
Crankson, S ;
Sripathi, V .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 68 (09) :641-642
[2]   Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children [J].
Bonnard, A ;
Fouquet, V ;
Carricaburu, E ;
Aigrain, Y ;
El-Ghoneimi, A .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (05) :1710-1713
[3]   Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years [J].
Cascio, S. ;
Tien, A. ;
Chee, W. ;
Tan, H. L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) :335-338
[4]   Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children [J].
El-Ghoneimi, A ;
Farhat, W ;
Bolduc, S ;
Bagli, D ;
McLorie, G ;
Aigrain, Y ;
Khoury, A .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (01) :104-108
[5]   Retroperitoneal-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Initial experience [J].
Farhat, W ;
Afshar, K ;
Papanikolaou, F ;
Austin, R ;
Khoury, A ;
Bagli, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (09) :879-882
[6]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status [J].
Inagaki, T ;
Rha, KH ;
Ong, AM ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Jarrett, TW .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 :102-105
[7]   Laparoscopic reconstructive urology [J].
Kaouk, JH ;
Gill, IS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) :1070-1078
[8]  
LEE A, 2001, BJU INT, V87, P1
[9]   Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Comparison with a cohort of open surgery [J].
Lee, RS ;
Retik, AB ;
Borer, JG ;
Peters, CA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (02) :683-687