Binaural interactions shape binaural response structures and frequency response functions in primary auditory cortex

被引:10
作者
Kitzes, Leonard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
frequency response function; binaural interactions; cortex; azimuth; localization;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2008.01.003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The overall purpose of this study is to examine the behavior of primary auditory cortex (AI) units in the three-dimensional stimulus space that resembles normal listening conditions, viz., level at the two ears and frequency. A binaural-level response area (LRA) is the response to a matrix of contralateral and ipsilateral stimuli presented at a single frequency. LRAs have been examined in the inferior colliculus and AI and found to be highly organized response patterns that are shaped by binaural interactions. The aggregate of LRAs across frequency is the binaural response structure (BRS), a new concept that captures unit behavior in this three-dimensional stimulus space. Since binaural interactions contribute greatly to configuring component LRAs, it is clear that binaural interactions help shape the aggregate BRS. The BRS contains the data required to generate binaural frequency response functions. The frequency range and magnitude of these functions depend on the level of the stimulus at each ear and the configuration of the BRS. Changing either level can greatly alter the binaural frequency response function. Thus, in addition to their classic role in localization, binaural interactions play a fundamentally important role in determining the frequency domain of units in AI. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental model updating using frequency response functions
    Hong, Yu
    Liu, Xi
    Dong, Xinjun
    Wang, Yang
    Pu, Qianhui
    SENSORS AND SMART STRUCTURES TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIL, MECHANICAL, AND AEROSPACE SYSTEMS 2016, 2016, 9803
  • [22] On the treatment of uncertainty in experimentally measured frequency response functions
    Meggitt, J. W. R.
    METROLOGIA, 2018, 55 (06) : 806 - 818
  • [23] A metric on the similarity between two frequency response functions
    Lee, Dooho
    Ahn, Tae-Soo
    Kim, Hyeon-Seok
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2018, 436 : 32 - 45
  • [24] Nonlinearity identification using sensitivity of frequency response functions
    Jalali, Hassan
    Bonab, Behzad T.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 19 (05) : 787 - 800
  • [25] A Method for the Assignment of Zeros Using Frequency Response Functions
    Huseyinoglu, Mesut
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 12 (04) : 6043 - 6052
  • [26] Cholinergic modulation of response gain in the rat primary visual cortex
    Soma, Shogo
    Shimegi, Satoshi
    Suematsu, Naofumi
    Sato, Hiromichi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2013, 3
  • [27] Stationary Response of Beams and Frames with Fractional Dampers through Exact Frequency Response Functions
    Failla, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2017, 143 (05)
  • [28] Practical Considerations for Estimating Road Vehicle Frequency Response Functions from Response Data
    Ainalis, Daniel
    Rouillard, Vincent
    Sek, Michael
    PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2017, 30 (04) : 127 - 144
  • [29] Myogenic artifacts masquerade as neuroplasticity in the auditory frequency-following response
    Bidelman, Gavin M.
    Sisson, Alexandria
    Rizzi, Rose
    Mac Lean, Jessica
    Baer, Kaitlin
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [30] Sound frequency affects the auditory motion-onset response in humans
    Sarrou, Mikaella
    Schmitz, Pia Marlena
    Hamm, Nicole
    Ruebsamen, Rudolf
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (10) : 2713 - 2726