The dark side of moral outrage: Understanding the risks to long-term, meaningful community development work in higher learning
被引:1
|
作者:
Cafer, Anne
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Mississippi, Community First Res Ctr Wellbeing, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, University, MS 38677 USAUniv Mississippi, Community First Res Ctr Wellbeing, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, University, MS 38677 USA
Cafer, Anne
[1
]
Rosenthal, Meagen
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Mississippi, Community First Res Ctr Wellbeing, Dept Pharm Adm, University, MS 38677 USAUniv Mississippi, Community First Res Ctr Wellbeing, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, University, MS 38677 USA
Rosenthal, Meagen
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Mississippi, Community First Res Ctr Wellbeing, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Community First Res Ctr Wellbeing, Dept Pharm Adm, University, MS 38677 USA
Virtue signaling;
community-based research;
social justice;
higher education;
community development;
scholar activist;
ACADEMIC-FREEDOM;
SOCIAL-JUSTICE;
EDUCATION;
ACTIVISM;
ENGAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1080/15575330.2022.2126510
中图分类号:
F0 [经济学];
F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
0201 ;
020105 ;
03 ;
0303 ;
摘要:
Social justice is a critical and increasingly utilized frame for organizing academic endeavors. As such it is important for academic communities to have meaningful conversations about the implications of social justice activities in their praxis. While recognizing many forms, this article is focused on the juxtaposition of academic activism and community development-based work. These activities can be complimentary and offer rich options for engagement by faculty and students in social change work. Yet there remain tensions between these activities in the absence of institutional or disciplinary guidelines for best practice. This article explores the "dark side" of these tensions and their consequences for faculty and communities. This paper also presents a call to action for faculty and institutions doing this work to center communities first and foremost to mitigate the potential devastation for community partners, who are as engaged in social change work but lack the same institutional protections.