Characterization of Hydrogel Made by pH-responsive Polymer and Alginate

被引:3
|
作者
Choi, Jiyeon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Sch Engn, Dept Mat Engn, Bunkyo Ku, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1138656, Japan
[2] Korea Inst Energy Res, Jeju Global Res Ctr, 200 Haemajihean Ro, Gujwa Eup 63357, Jeju, South Korea
关键词
polymer; pH-responsive; hydrogel; alginate; surface plasmon resonance; SOLUBLE PHOSPHOLIPID POLYMERS; PHYSIOLOGICAL PH; TITANIUM-ALLOY; RELEASE; SURFACE; COPOLYMERS; GEL;
D O I
10.7317/pk.2017.41.6.1046
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
4-Vinylphenylboronic acid (VPBA) and N,N'-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) are pH-sensitive compounds; VPBA can bind to cis-diol compounds above pH 8 to form covalent bonds, while DMAEMA unit is activated to quaternary ammonium through ionization below pH 7. In this study, a phospholipid polymer (PMDV) composed of VPBA, DMAEMA, and 2-methacryloylphosphorycholin was synthesized and reacted with alginate (ALG) to form a hydrogel, which is a polysaccharide comprising two repeating carboxylated monosaccharide units. The hydrogel was characterized using a rheometer (for gelation and gel dissociation), FTIR, and SEM. Furthermore, multilayered hydrogel was fabricated by PMDV and ALG via layer-by-layer (LbL) method. The affinity between ALG and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was exploited to load VEGF into ALG layer through LbL method, which was confirmed by SPR analysis. The driving force can be controlled by changing the pH for the fabrication of PMDV/ALG hydrogel for application in drug delivery system.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1051
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] pH-responsive chitosan/alginate polyelectrolyte complex membranes reinforced by tripolyphosphate
    Gierszewska, Magdalena
    Ostrowska-Czubenko, Jadwiga
    Chrzanowska, Ewelina
    EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL, 2018, 101 : 282 - 290
  • [22] Cellulose-based injectable hydrogel composite for pH-responsive and controllable drug delivery
    Chen, Nusheng
    Wang, Hui
    Ling, Chen
    Vermerris, Wilfred
    Wang, Bin
    Tong, Zhaohui
    CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS, 2019, 225
  • [23] Cytotoxicity and pH-Responsive Release Properties of α-Mangostin-Loaded Nano Polydopamine-Alginate Hydrogel
    Phan, Hoang Lich
    Tran, Ngoc Cam Trang
    Le, Quoc-Viet
    Thach, Ut Dong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2025,
  • [24] pH-Responsive Chitosan/Alginate Polyelectrolyte Complexes on Electrospun PLGA Nanofibers for Controlled Drug Release
    Schoeller, Jean
    Itel, Fabian
    Wuertz-Kozak, Karin
    Gaiser, Sandra
    Luisier, Nicolas
    Hegemann, Dirk
    Ferguson, Stephen J.
    Fortunato, Giuseppino
    Rossi, Rene M.
    NANOMATERIALS, 2021, 11 (07)
  • [25] Preparation and application of a novel pH-responsive linalool carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel
    An, Yuanbiao
    Zhai, Rui
    Chen, Jinni
    Xie, Peng
    JOURNAL OF MACROMOLECULAR SCIENCE PART A-PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2023, 60 (05): : 336 - 345
  • [26] Preparation and Characterization of pH-Responsive Hydrogel Particles with Acid-Insoluble Carboxy-Containing Monomer
    Shimizu, Hidenobu
    Nagaoka, Hiroki
    Wada, Risei
    Okabe, Masaru
    KOBUNSHI RONBUNSHU, 2015, 72 (10) : 642 - 647
  • [27] Equilibrium Adsorption of Hexahistidine on pH-Responsive Hydrogel Nanofilms
    Longo, Gabriel S.
    de la Cruz, Monica Olvera
    Szleifer, Igal
    LANGMUIR, 2014, 30 (50) : 15335 - 15344
  • [28] Fabrication and physicochemical investigation of pH-responsive alginate/ pectin hybrid network hydrogel for improved stability and controlled release of diallyl thiosulfinate
    Bhattacharya, Souptik
    Das, Shaoli
    Banik, Sanjukta
    MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 38
  • [29] A Smart pH-Responsive Three Components Luminescent Hydrogel
    Li, Yibao
    Liu, Wei
    Cheng, Linxiu
    Huang, Ping
    Peng, Yu
    Wu, Yongquan
    Li, Xun
    Li, Xiaokang
    Fan, Xiaolin
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2016, 7 (03)
  • [30] Dissolution kinetics of pH responsive alginate-pectin hydrogel particles
    Guo, Jingxin
    Kaletunc, Gonul
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 88 : 129 - 139