Cancer-specific variation in emergency presentation by sex, age and deprivation across 27 common and rarer cancers

被引:84
作者
Abel, G. A. [1 ]
Shelton, J. [2 ,3 ]
Johnson, S. [3 ]
Elliss-Brookes, L. [3 ]
Lyratzopoulos, G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
[2] Care Qual Commiss, London EC1Y 8TG, England
[3] Publ Hlth England, Natl Canc Intelligence Network, London SE1 8UG, England
[4] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Hlth Behav Res Ctr, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
emergency; diagnosis; route; age; sex; deprivation; inequalities; COLORECTAL-CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; PATIENT; COLON; ADMISSIONS; SURGERY; ROUTES; STAGE; RISK; LUNG;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2015.52
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Although overall sociodemographic and cancer site variation in the risk of cancer diagnosis through emergency presentation has been previously described, relatively little is known about how this risk may vary differentially by sex, age and deprivation group between patients with a given cancer. Methods: Data from the Routes to Diagnosis project on 749 645 patients (2006-2010) with any of 27 cancers that can occur in either sex were analysed. Crude proportions and crude and adjusted odds ratios were calculated for emergency presentation, and interactions between sex, age and deprivation with cancer were examined. Results: The overall proportion of patients diagnosed through emergency presentation varied greatly by cancer. Compared with men, women were at greater risk for emergency presentation for bladder, brain, rectal, liver, stomach, colon and lung cancer (e.g., bladder cancer-specific odds ratio for women vs men, 1.50; 95% CI 1.39-1.60), whereas the opposite was true for oral/oropharyngeal cancer, lymphomas and melanoma (e.g., oropharyngeal cancer-specific odds ratio for women vs men, 0.49; 95% CI 0.32-0.73). Similarly, younger patients were at higher risk for emergency presentation for acute leukaemia, colon, stomach and oesophageal cancer (e.g., colon cancer-specific odds ratio in 35-44- vs 65-74-year-olds, 2.01; 95% CI 1.76-2.30) and older patients for laryngeal, melanoma, thyroid, oral and Hodgkin's lymphoma (e.g., melanoma specific odds ratio in 35-44- vs 65-74-year-olds, 0.20; 95% CI 0.12-0.33). Inequalities in the risk of emergency presentation by deprivation group were greatest for oral/oropharyngeal, anal, laryngeal and small intestine cancers. Conclusions: Among patients with the same cancer, the risk for emergency presentation varies notably by sex, age and deprivation group. The findings suggest that, beyond tumour biology, diagnosis through an emergency route may be associated both with psychosocial processes, which can delay seeking of medical help, and with difficulties in suspecting the diagnosis of cancer after presentation.
引用
收藏
页码:S129 / S136
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Pathways to the diagnosis of lung cancer in the UK: a cohort study
    Barrett, Jacqueline
    Hamilton, William
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [2] Cancer Fatalism: Deterring Early Presentation and Increasing Social Inequalities?
    Beeken, Rebecca J.
    Simon, Alice E.
    von Wagner, Christian
    Whitaker, Katriina L.
    Wardle, Jane
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (10) : 2127 - 2131
  • [3] Association between patient and general practice characteristics and unplanned first-time admissions for cancer: observational study
    Bottle, A.
    Tsang, C.
    Parsons, C.
    Majeed, A.
    Soljak, M.
    Aylin, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (08) : 1213 - 1219
  • [4] Clinical features of colorectal cancer before emergency presentation: a population-based case-control study
    Cleary, Jonathan
    Peters, Tim J.
    Sharp, Deborah
    Hamilton, William
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2007, 24 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [5] Department for Communities and Local Government, 2011, ENGL IND DEPR 2010
  • [6] Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets
    Elliss-Brookes, L.
    McPhail, S.
    Ives, A.
    Greenslade, M.
    Shelton, J.
    Hiom, S.
    Richards, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (08) : 1220 - 1226
  • [7] Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival?
    Forbes, L. J. L.
    Simon, A. E.
    Warburton, F.
    Boniface, D.
    Brain, K. E.
    Dessaix, A.
    Donnelly, C.
    Haynes, K.
    Hvidberg, L.
    Lagerlund, M.
    Lockwood, G.
    Tishelman, C.
    Vedsted, P.
    Vigmostad, M. N.
    Ramirez, A. J.
    Wardle, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (02) : 292 - 300
  • [8] Emergency presentation and socioeconomic status in colon cancer
    Gunnarsson, H.
    Ekholm, A.
    Olsson, L. I.
    [J]. EJSO, 2013, 39 (08): : 831 - 836
  • [9] Emergency admissions of cancer as a marker of diagnostic delay
    Hamilton, W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (08) : 1205 - 1206
  • [10] Hamilton WT, 2005, THESIS U BRISTOL BRI