INDUSTRY 4.0 AND NATIONAL SECURITY: THE PHENOMENON OF DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY

被引:13
作者
Limba, Tadas [1 ,2 ]
Stankevicius, Andrius [3 ]
Andrulevicius, Antanas [1 ]
机构
[1] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Ateities Str 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Mykolas Romeris Univ, English, Ateities Str 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Mykolas Romeris Univ, Fac Publ Secur, Ateities Str 20, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
critical infrastructure; disruptive technology; fourth industrial revolution; national security;
D O I
10.9770/jssi.2019.6.3(33)
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Fourth Industrial Revolution, based on digital platforms is characterized by a convergence of technologies that is blurring the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres. These phenomeon disrupts patterns of development and opens new paths to development. (WEFORUM. 2018) Digital technology development presuppose methodological challenges not only to business or individual interest, but holistic approach to national security issues. Hybrid threats, economic crises, social inequalities, and labor migration are among the main challenges of global security. What are possible manifestations of disruptive technology in national security interest in the broader sense? Is it possible timely to identify and react to threats to competitivness, "job killer" or law system? Critical infrastructure are parameter, which identifies assets or system as element of security. Topic reveal interaction between disruptive technology and critical infrastructure in the context of national security. Authors argued, that the theoretical insights, obtained by document analysis, classification, critical analysis, abstraction methods will be useful in practical use, to provide expert knowledge and a deeper understanding manifestations of disruptive technology in security issues at all levels.
引用
收藏
页码:1528 / 1535
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]  
Narodowy Bank Polski (NBP) and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), 2017, VIRT CURR
[12]  
Novikovas A., 2017, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, V7, P369, DOI [10.9770/jssi.2017.7.2(16), DOI 10.9770/JSSI.2017.7.2(16)]
[13]   A model for understanding the orders of magnitude of disruptive technologies [J].
Schuelke-Leech, Beth-Anne .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 :261-274
[14]  
Schwab Klaus, 2016, 4 IND REV
[15]   TRANSPARENT LOBBYING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: CASE OF LITHUANIA [J].
Stankevicius, Andrius ;
Luksaite, Asta .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2016, 4 (02) :220-227
[16]  
The National Cyber Security Centre under the Ministry of National Defence of Lithuania, 2018, INF B INV YAND
[17]  
Tvaronaviciene M., 2018, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, V8, P143, DOI [10.9770/jssi.2018.8.2, DOI 10.9770/JSSI.2018.8.2]
[18]   START-UPS ACROSS THE EU: IF PARTICULAR TENDENCIES COULD BE TRACED [J].
Tvaronaviciene, Manuela .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2016, 3 (03) :290-298
[19]  
Wilson James Q, 1982, ATLANTIC MONTHLY, V249, P29, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412959193.n281