Quantifying ecosystem services of dominate forests in the Beijing mountain area

被引:10
作者
Mo, Lichun [1 ]
Liu, Jiakai [2 ]
Chen, Jiancheng [1 ]
Xie, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Ecol & Nat Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Forest type; Beijing mountains; Soil conservation; Water conservation; Forest biodiversity; CARBON STORAGE; NATURE-RESERVE; VALUES; BASIN; VALUATION; ECONOMICS; PROVINCE; WETLANDS; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-09013-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, the forest landscape in the Beijing mountain area is assessed using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs model. The results showed the natural forests have higher functional capital than the planted forests and different species contribute to different ecological functions. Specifically, Larix gmelinii forests have the highest water resources and soil conservation function which are about 334.14 m(3) hm(-2) year(-1) and 115.92 t hm(-2) year(-1); Betula allegansis forests have the highest carbon storage and biodiversity function which are about 128.46 t hm(-2) year(-1) and 0.76. Besides soil, water is conserved more within coniferous forests than within broadleaf forests. Carbon sequestration and the functional capacity for biodiversity within a unit area of coniferous forests are much smaller than those within a unit area of a broadleaf forest. Previous studies highlight the forest management strategies will influence the ecosystem functions while in the current studies we also found the species option during the afforestation is equally important and protecting of the natural forests is more important than afforestation for maintaining the ecological functional capitals.
引用
收藏
页码:27773 / 27785
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[11]   Value of ecosystem services in China [J].
Chen, ZX ;
Zhang, XS .
CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2000, 45 (10) :870-+
[12]  
Costanza R, 2008, AMBIO, V37, P241, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[241:TVOCWF]2.0.CO
[13]  
2
[14]   Forest Ecosystem Services and Eco-Compensation Mechanisms in China [J].
Deng, Hongbing ;
Zheng, Peng ;
Liu, Tianxing ;
Liu, Xin .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 48 (06) :1079-1085
[15]   Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models [J].
Deng, Jian ;
Sun, Pingsheng ;
Zhao, Fazhu ;
Han, Xinhui ;
Yang, Gaihe ;
Feng, Yongzhong .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 550 :382-390
[16]   Competing freshwater and ecological services in the river basin perspective -: An expanded conceptual framework [J].
Falkenmark, M .
WATER INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 25 (02) :172-177
[17]  
Fan LanYing Fan LanYing, 2018, Asian Agricultural Research, V10, P5
[18]   Forest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil [J].
Fiorini, Ana Carolina Oliveira ;
Mullally, Conner ;
Swisher, Marilyn ;
Putz, Francis E. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169
[19]   Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions [J].
Goldstein, Joshua H. ;
Caldarone, Giorgio ;
Duarte, Thomas Kaeo ;
Ennaanay, Driss ;
Hannahs, Neil ;
Mendoza, Guillermo ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Wolny, Stacie ;
Daily, Gretchen C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (19) :7565-7570
[20]   Integrating the valuation of ecosystem services into the Input-Output economics of an Alpine region [J].
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne ;
Kytziab, Susanne .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (04) :786-798