Quantifying ecosystem services of dominate forests in the Beijing mountain area

被引:10
作者
Mo, Lichun [1 ]
Liu, Jiakai [2 ]
Chen, Jiancheng [1 ]
Xie, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Ecol & Nat Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Forest type; Beijing mountains; Soil conservation; Water conservation; Forest biodiversity; CARBON STORAGE; NATURE-RESERVE; VALUES; BASIN; VALUATION; ECONOMICS; PROVINCE; WETLANDS; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-09013-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, the forest landscape in the Beijing mountain area is assessed using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs model. The results showed the natural forests have higher functional capital than the planted forests and different species contribute to different ecological functions. Specifically, Larix gmelinii forests have the highest water resources and soil conservation function which are about 334.14 m(3) hm(-2) year(-1) and 115.92 t hm(-2) year(-1); Betula allegansis forests have the highest carbon storage and biodiversity function which are about 128.46 t hm(-2) year(-1) and 0.76. Besides soil, water is conserved more within coniferous forests than within broadleaf forests. Carbon sequestration and the functional capacity for biodiversity within a unit area of coniferous forests are much smaller than those within a unit area of a broadleaf forest. Previous studies highlight the forest management strategies will influence the ecosystem functions while in the current studies we also found the species option during the afforestation is equally important and protecting of the natural forests is more important than afforestation for maintaining the ecological functional capitals.
引用
收藏
页码:27773 / 27785
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Applying the social-ecological systems framework to the evaluation and design of payment for ecosystem service schemes in the Eurasian steppe [J].
Addison, J. ;
Greiner, R. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 25 (12) :2421-2440
[2]   Use and perceived importance of forest ecosystem services in rural livelihoods of Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh [J].
Ahammad, Ronju ;
Stacey, Natasha ;
Sunderland, Terry C. H. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 35 :87-98
[3]   Ecohydrology in a Brazilian tropical dry forest: thinned vegetation impact on hydrological functions and ecosystem services [J].
Andrade, Eunice Maia ;
Simas Guerreiro, Maria Joao ;
Queiroz Palacio, Helba Araujo ;
Campos, Diego Antunes .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 27
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
[5]   Valuing forest-based ecosystem services in Bangladesh: Implications for research and policies [J].
Barua, Sepul K. ;
Boscolo, Marco ;
Animon, Illias .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 42
[6]  
Biesemans J, 2000, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V55, P35
[7]   Net value of forest ecosystem services in China [J].
Cao, Shixiong ;
Suo, Xinhao ;
Xia, Chengqi ;
Yu, Zhongqi ;
Feng, Fei .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 142
[8]   Ecological policy benefit valuation based on public feedback: Forest ecosystem services in Wuyishan nature reserve, China [J].
Chang, Yaxuan ;
Zou, Taohong ;
Yoshino, Kunihiko ;
Luo, Shezhou ;
Zhou, Shungui .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 673 :622-630
[9]  
Chaparro L., 2009, ECOLOGICAL SERVICES
[10]   Beyond deforestation: Restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands [J].
Chazdon, Robin L. .
SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) :1458-1460