Viewing the Kenyan health system through an equity lens: implications for universal coverage

被引:76
作者
Chuma, Jane [1 ,2 ]
Okungu, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] Kenya Govt Med Res Ctr, Wellcome Trust Res Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Clin Med, Ctr Trop Med, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
USER FEES; HOUSEHOLD LEVEL; SECTOR REFORMS; RURAL KENYA; CARE; AFRICA; IMPACT; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS; CHARGES;
D O I
10.1186/1475-9276-10-22
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Equity and universal coverage currently dominate policy debates worldwide. Health financing approaches are central to universal coverage. The way funds are collected, pooled, and used to purchase or provide services should be carefully considered to ensure that population needs are addressed under a universal health system. The aim of this paper is to assess the extent to which the Kenyan health financing system meets the key requirements for universal coverage, including income and risk cross-subsidisation. Recommendations on how to address existing equity challenges and progress towards universal coverage are made. Methods: An extensive review of published and gray literature was conducted to identify the sources of health care funds in Kenya. Documents were mainly sourced from the Ministry of Medical Services and the Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. Country level documents were the main sources of data. In cases where data were not available at the country level, they were sought from the World Health Organisation website. Each financing mechanism was analysed in respect to key functions namely, revenue generation, pooling and purchasing. Results: The Kenyan health sector relies heavily on out-of-pocket payments. Government funds are mainly allocated through historical incremental approach. The sector is largely underfunded and health care contributions are regressive (i.e. the poor contribute a larger proportion of their income to health care than the rich). Health financing in Kenya is fragmented and there is very limited risk and income cross-subsidisation. The country has made little progress towards achieving international benchmarks including the Abuja target of allocating 15% of government's budget to the health sector. Conclusions: The Kenyan health system is highly inequitable and policies aimed at promoting equity and addressing the needs of the poor and vulnerable have not been successful. Some progress has been made towards addressing equity challenges, but universal coverage will not be achieved unless the country adopts a systemic approach to health financing reforms. Such an approach should be informed by the wider health system goals of equity and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance
[2]  
[Anonymous], EQUINET DISCUSSION P
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MACROECONOMICS HLTH
[4]   INCENTIVES AND PROVIDER PAYMENT METHODS [J].
BARNUM, H ;
KUTZIN, J ;
SAXENIAN, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 10 (01) :23-45
[5]   Treatment-seeking behaviour, cost burdens and coping strategies among rural and urban households in Coastal Kenya: an equity analysis [J].
Chuma, Jane ;
Gilson, Lucy ;
Molyneux, Catherine .
TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2007, 12 (05) :673-686
[6]   Barriers to prompt and effective malaria treatment among the poorest population in Kenya [J].
Chuma, Jane ;
Okungu, Vincent ;
Molyneux, Catherine .
MALARIA JOURNAL, 2010, 9
[7]   Reducing user fees for primary health care in Kenya: Policy on paper or policy in practice? [J].
Chuma, Jane ;
Musimbi, Janet ;
Okungu, Vincent ;
Goodman, Catherine ;
Molyneux, Catherine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2009, 8
[8]   Rethinking the economic costs of malaria at the household level: Evidence from applying a new analytical framework in rural Kenya [J].
Chuma, Jane M. ;
Thiede, Michael ;
Molyneux, Catherine S. .
MALARIA JOURNAL, 2006, 5 (1)
[9]   The fall and rise of cost sharing in Kenya: The impact of phased implementation [J].
Collins, D ;
Quick, JD ;
Musau, SN ;
Kraushaar, D ;
Hussein, IM .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 1996, 11 (01) :52-63
[10]  
FREEDMAN P, 2005, WHOS GOT POWER TRANS