Global costs of protecting against sea-level rise at 1.5 to 4.0 °C

被引:30
作者
Brown, Sally [1 ]
Jenkins, Katie [2 ]
Goodwin, Philip [3 ]
Lincke, Daniel [4 ]
Vafeidis, Athanasios T. [5 ]
Tol, Richard S. J. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Jenkins, Rhosanna [2 ]
Warren, Rachel [2 ]
Nicholls, Robert J. [2 ]
Jevrejeva, Svetlana [9 ,10 ]
Arcilla, Agustin Sanchez [11 ]
Haigh, Ivan D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Dept Life & Environm Sci, Bournemouth, Dorset, England
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Sch Ocean & Earth Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Global Climate Forum, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Kiel, Inst Geog, Kiel, Germany
[6] Univ Sussex, Dept Econ, Falmer, England
[7] Vrije Univ, Inst Environm Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Vrije Univ, Dept Spatial Econ, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Ctr Climate Res Singapore, 36 Kim Chuan Rd, Singapore 537054, Singapore
[10] Natl Oceanog Ctr, 6 Brownlow St, Liverpool L3 5DA, Merseyside, England
[11] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Sea-level rise; Adaptation; Dike; Cost; Damage; ANTARCTIC ICE-SHEET; CLIMATE-CHANGE; 2.0-DEGREES-C RISE; VULNERABILITY; MITIGATION; SCENARIOS; MODEL; 1.5-DEGREES-C; TEMPERATURES; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-021-03130-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sea levels will rise, even with stringent climate change mitigation. Mitigation will slow the rate of rise. There is limited knowledge on how the costs of coastal protection vary with alternative global warming levels of 1.5 to 4.0 degrees C. Analysing six sea-level rise scenarios (0.74 to 1.09 m, 50th percentile) across these warming levels, and five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, this paper quantifies the economic costs of flooding and protection due to sea-level rise using the Dynamic Interactive Vulnerability Assessment (DIVA) modelling framework. Results are presented for World Bank income groups and five selected countries from the present to 2100. Annual sea flood damage costs without additional adaptation are more influenced by socio-economic development than sea-level rise, indicating that there are opportunities to control risk with development choices. In contrast, annual sea dike investment costs are more dependent on the magnitude of sea-level rise. In terms of total costs with adaptation, upper middle, low middle and low income groups are projected to have higher relative costs as a proportion of GDP compared with high income groups. If low income countries protected now, flood costs could be reduced after 2050 and beyond. However, without further adaptation, their coasts will experience growing risks and costs leaving them increasingly reliant on emergency response measures. Without mitigation or adaptation, greater inequalities in damage costs between income groups could result. At country level, annual sea flood damage costs without additional adaptation are projected to rapidly increase with approximately 0.2 m of sea-level rise, leaving limited time to plan and adapt.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] A Review of Cost Estimates for Flood Adaptation
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    [J]. WATER, 2018, 10 (11)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, BBC
  • [3] Determining global population distribution: Methods, applications and data
    Balk, D. L.
    Deichmann, U.
    Yetman, G.
    Pozzi, F.
    Hay, S. I.
    Nelson, A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY, VOL 62: GLOBAL MAPPING OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES: METHODS, EXAMPLES AND EMERGING APPLICATIONS, 2006, 62 : 119 - 156
  • [4] Ice sheet contributions to future sea-level rise from structured expert judgment
    Bamber, Jonathan L.
    Oppenheimer, Michael
    Kopp, Robert E.
    Aspinall, Willy P.
    Cooke, Roger M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (23) : 11195 - 11200
  • [5] Time is running out for sand
    Bendixen, Mette
    Best, Jim
    Hackney, Chris
    Iversen, Lars Lonsmann
    [J]. NATURE, 2019, 571 (7763) : 29 - 31
  • [6] Black KP, 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT, VI
  • [7] Quantifying Land and People Exposed to Sea-Level Rise with No Mitigation and 1.5°C and 2.0°C Rise in Global Temperatures to Year 2300
    Brown, S.
    Nicholls, R. J.
    Goodwin, P.
    Haigh, I. D.
    Lincke, D.
    Vafeidis, A. T.
    Hinkel, J.
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2018, 6 (03) : 583 - 600
  • [8] Land raising as a solution to sea-level rise: An analysis of coastal flooding on an artificial island in the Maldives
    Brown, Sally
    Wadey, Matthew P.
    Nicholls, Robert J.
    Shareef, Ali
    Khaleel, Zammath
    Hinkel, Jochen
    Lincke, Daniel
    McCabe, Maurice V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13
  • [9] What are the implications of sea-level rise for a 1.5, 2 and 3 A°C rise in global mean temperatures in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna and other vulnerable deltas?
    Brown, Sally
    Nicholls, Robert J.
    Lazar, Attila N.
    Hornby, Duncan D.
    Hill, Chris
    Hazra, Sugata
    Addo, Kwasi Appeaning
    Haque, Anisul
    Caesar, John
    Tompkins, Emma L.
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2018, 18 (06) : 1829 - 1842
  • [10] Sea level rise and its coastal impacts
    Cazenave, Anny
    Le Cozannet, Goneri
    [J]. EARTHS FUTURE, 2014, 2 (02) : 15 - 34