Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults

被引:7
作者
Pourmajidian, Maryam [1 ]
Lauber, Benedikt [2 ]
Sidhu, Simranjit K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Fribourg, Dept Neurosci & Movement Sci, Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
Corticospinal excitability; Neuromodulation; Cycling exercise; Homeostatic metaplasticity; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX PLASTICITY; AEROBIC EXERCISE; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SINGLE BOUT; INDUCTION; TDCS; METAPLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134597
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The study aimed to examine the effect of a pre-conditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) before subsequent anodal-tDCS (atDCS) was applied during low workload cycling exercise on the corticospinal responses in young healthy individuals. Eleven young subjects participated in two sessions receiving either conditioning ctDCS or sham stimulation, followed by atDCS while cycling (i.e. ctDCS-atDCS, sham-atDCS) at 1.2 times their body weight (84 +/- 20 W) in a counterbalanced double-blind design. Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation with the intensity set to produce an MEP amplitude of 1 mV in a resting hand muscle at baseline (PRE), following preconditioning tDCS (POST - COND) and post atDCS combined with cycling exercise (POST-TEST). There was a significant interaction between time and intervention (P < 0.01) on MEPs. MEPs increased from PRE (1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) to POST-TEST (1.3 +/- 0.06 mV) during ctDCS-atDCS (P < 0.001) but did not change significantly across time during sham-atDCS (P > 0.7). Furthermore, MEPs were higher in ctDCS-atDCS compared to sham-atDCS (both P < 0.01) at POST - COND (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.1 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) and POST-TEST (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.3 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV). These outcomes demonstrate that pre-conditioning cathodal tDCS can enhance subsequent corticospinal excitability changes induced by anodal tDCS applied in combination with cycling exercise. The findings have implications for the application of tDCS in combination with cycling exercise in rehabilitation and sporting contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Mechanisms and Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Giordano, James ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Kappenman, Emily S. ;
Clark, Vincent P. ;
Coslett, H. Branch ;
Hamblin, Michael R. ;
Hamilton, Roy ;
Jankord, Ryan ;
Kozumbo, Walter J. ;
McKinley, R. Andrew ;
Nitsche, Michael A. ;
Reilly, J. Patrick ;
Richardson, Jessica ;
Wurzman, Rachel ;
Calabrese, Edward .
DOSE-RESPONSE, 2017, 15 (01)
[32]   Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training? [J].
Cabral, Maria E. ;
Baltar, Adriana ;
Borba, Rebeka ;
Galvao, Silvana ;
Santos, Luciana ;
Fregni, Felipe ;
Monte-Silva, Katia .
NEUROREPORT, 2015, 26 (11) :618-622
[33]   Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Refractory Epilepsy: A Noninvasive Neuromodulation Therapy [J].
San-Juan, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (06) :503-508
[34]   Shaping the Optimal Repetition Interval for Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) [J].
Monte-Silva, Katia ;
Kuo, Min-Fang ;
Liebetanz, David ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Nitsche, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 103 (04) :1735-1740
[35]   Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex facilitates observational learning of a motor sequence [J].
Wade, Stephanie ;
Hammond, Geoff .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 41 (12) :1597-1602
[36]   A safety study of 500 μA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rat [J].
Keying Zhang ;
Ling Guo ;
Junping Zhang ;
Guangzhou An ;
Yan Zhou ;
Jiajin Lin ;
Junling Xing ;
Mai Lu ;
Guirong Ding .
BMC Neuroscience, 20
[37]   A safety study of 500 μA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in rat [J].
Zhang, Keying ;
Guo, Ling ;
Zhang, Junping ;
An, Guangzhou ;
Zhou, Yan ;
Lin, Jiajin ;
Xing, Junling ;
Lu, Mai ;
Ding, Guirong .
BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 20 (01)
[38]   Comparing the effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex at varying intensities on motor learning in healthy young adults [J].
Mousavi, Sheida ;
Mottahedi, Amin ;
Ehsani, Fatemeh ;
Delkhosh, Cyrus Taghizadeh ;
Jaberzadeh, Shapour .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 60 (10) :6543-6555
[39]   Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans [J].
Bashir, Shahid ;
Ahmad, Shafiq ;
Alatefi, Moath ;
Hamza, Ali ;
Sharaf, Mohamed ;
Fecteau, Shirely ;
Yoo, Woo Kyoung .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2019, 7 (13)
[40]   Exploring and optimizing the neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex of older humans [J].
Farnad, Leila ;
Ghasemian-Shirvan, Ensiyeh ;
Mosayebi-Samani, Mohsen ;
Kuo, Min-Fang ;
Nitsche, Michael A. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2021, 14 (03) :622-634