Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults

被引:7
作者
Pourmajidian, Maryam [1 ]
Lauber, Benedikt [2 ]
Sidhu, Simranjit K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Discipline Physiol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Fribourg, Dept Neurosci & Movement Sci, Fribourg, Switzerland
关键词
Corticospinal excitability; Neuromodulation; Cycling exercise; Homeostatic metaplasticity; PAIRED ASSOCIATIVE STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX PLASTICITY; AEROBIC EXERCISE; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SINGLE BOUT; INDUCTION; TDCS; METAPLASTICITY; EXCITABILITY; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134597
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The study aimed to examine the effect of a pre-conditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) before subsequent anodal-tDCS (atDCS) was applied during low workload cycling exercise on the corticospinal responses in young healthy individuals. Eleven young subjects participated in two sessions receiving either conditioning ctDCS or sham stimulation, followed by atDCS while cycling (i.e. ctDCS-atDCS, sham-atDCS) at 1.2 times their body weight (84 +/- 20 W) in a counterbalanced double-blind design. Corticospinal excitability was measured with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation with the intensity set to produce an MEP amplitude of 1 mV in a resting hand muscle at baseline (PRE), following preconditioning tDCS (POST - COND) and post atDCS combined with cycling exercise (POST-TEST). There was a significant interaction between time and intervention (P < 0.01) on MEPs. MEPs increased from PRE (1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) to POST-TEST (1.3 +/- 0.06 mV) during ctDCS-atDCS (P < 0.001) but did not change significantly across time during sham-atDCS (P > 0.7). Furthermore, MEPs were higher in ctDCS-atDCS compared to sham-atDCS (both P < 0.01) at POST - COND (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.1 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV) and POST-TEST (ctDCS-atDCS: 1.3 +/- 0.06 mV, sham-atDCS: 1.0 +/- 0.06 mV). These outcomes demonstrate that pre-conditioning cathodal tDCS can enhance subsequent corticospinal excitability changes induced by anodal tDCS applied in combination with cycling exercise. The findings have implications for the application of tDCS in combination with cycling exercise in rehabilitation and sporting contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats [J].
Jackson, Mark P. ;
Truong, Dennis ;
Brownlow, Milene L. ;
Wagner, Jessica A. ;
McKinley, R. Andy ;
Bikson, Marom ;
Jankord, Ryan .
BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY, 2017, 64 :152-161
[22]   Somatosensory Gating Is Modulated by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Montoro, Casandra, I ;
Winterholler, Christine ;
Terrasa, Juan L. ;
Montoya, Pedro .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
[23]   No effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity function [J].
He, Qing ;
Lin, Bo-Rong ;
Zhao, Jin ;
Shi, Ying-Zhen ;
Yan, Fang-Fang ;
Huang, Chang-Bing .
RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 37 (02) :109-118
[24]   Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates category learning [J].
Gibson, Benjamin C. ;
Mullins, Teagan S. ;
Heinrich, Melissa D. ;
Witkiewitz, Katie ;
Yu, Alfred B. ;
Hansberger, Jeffrey T. ;
Clark, Vincent P. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (02) :393-400
[25]   Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation [J].
Jamil, Asif ;
Batsikadze, Giorgi ;
Kuo, Hsiao-I. ;
Labruna, Ludovica ;
Hasan, Alkomiet ;
Paulus, Walter ;
Nitsche, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2017, 595 (04) :1273-1288
[26]   Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Epilepsy [J].
San-juan, Daniel ;
Morales-Quezada, Leon ;
Orozco Garduno, Adolfo Josue ;
Alonso-Vanegas, Mario ;
Fernandez Gonzalez-Aragon, Maricarmen ;
Espinoza Lopez, Dulce Anabel ;
Vazquez Gregorio, Rafael ;
Anschel, David J. ;
Fregni, Felipe .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2015, 8 (03) :455-464
[27]   Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Schizophrenia [J].
Agarwal, Mahavir ;
Shivakumar, Venkataram ;
Bose, Anushree ;
Subramaniam, Aditi ;
Nawani, Hema ;
Chhabra, Harleen ;
Kalmady, Sunil V. ;
Narayanaswamy, Janardhanan C. ;
Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan .
CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 11 (03) :118-125
[28]   Investigating the Working Mechanism of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation [J].
Lescrauwaet, Emma ;
Sprengers, Mathieu ;
Carrette, Evelien ;
Algoet, Chloe ;
Mertens, Ann ;
Klooster, Debby ;
Beumer, Steven ;
Mestrom, Rob ;
Raedt, Robrecht ;
Boon, Paul ;
Vonck, Kristl .
NEUROMODULATION, 2025, 28 (01) :68-75
[29]   Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Serotonergic Enhancement on Memory Performance in Young and Older Adults [J].
Prehn, Kristin ;
Stengl, Helena ;
Grittner, Ulrike ;
Kosiolek, Rene ;
Oelschlaeger, Anja ;
Weidemann, Alexandra ;
Floeel, Agnes .
NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 (02) :551-561
[30]   Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurodegenerative Disorders [J].
Pellicciari, Maria Concetta ;
Miniussi, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2018, 34 (03) :193-202